Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Brain Aging in Specific Phobia: An ENIGMA-Anxiety Mega-Analysis

  • Kimberly V. Blake
  • , Kevin Hilbert
  • , Jonathan C. Ipser
  • , Laura K.M. Han
  • , Janna Marie Bas-Hoogendam
  • , Fredrik Åhs
  • , Jochen Bauer
  • , Katja Beesdo-Baum
  • , Johannes Björkstrand
  • , Laura Blanco-Hinojo
  • , Joscha Böhnlein
  • , Robin Bülow
  • , Marta Cano
  • , Narcis Cardoner
  • , Xavier Caseras
  • , Udo Dannlowski
  • , Mats Fredrikson
  • , Liesbet Goossens
  • , Hans J. Grabe
  • , Dominik Grotegerd
  • Tim Hahn, Alfons Hamm, Ingmar Heinig, Martin J. Herrmann, David Hofmann, Hamidreza Jamalabadi, Andreas Jansen, Merel Kindt, Tilo Kircher, Anna L. Klahn, Katja Koelkebeck, Axel Krug, Elisabeth J. Leehr, Martin Lotze, Juergen Margraf, Markus Muehlhan, Igor Nenadić, Wenceslao Peñate, Andre Pittig, Jens Plag, Jesús Pujol, Jan Richter, Isabelle C. Ridderbusch, Francisco Rivero, Axel Schäfer, Judith Schäfer, Anne Schienle, Elisabeth Schrammen, Koen Schruers, Esther Seidl, Rudolf M. Stark, Benjamin Straube, Thomas Straube, Andreas Ströhle, Boris Suchan, Lea Teutenberg, Sophia I. Thomopoulos, Carlos Ventura-Bort, Renee M. Visser, Henry Völzke, Albert Wabnegger, André Wannemüller, Julia Wendt, Hans Ulrich Wittchen, Katharina Wittfeld, Yunbo Yang, Anna Zilverstand, Peter Zwanzger, Lianne Schmaal, Moji Aghajani, Daniel S. Pine, Paul M. Thompson, Nic J.A. van der Wee, Dan J. Stein, Ulrike Lueken, Nynke A. Groenewold

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Specific phobia (SPH) is a prevalent anxiety disorder and may involve advanced biological aging. However, limited brain age research has been conducted in anxiety disorders. This mega-analysis investigated brain aging in SPH participants within the ENIGMA-Anxiety Working Group. 3D brain structural MRI scans from 17 international samples (600 SPH individuals, of whom 504 formally diagnosed and 96 questionnaire-based cases; 1134 controls; age range: 22–75 years) were processed with FreeSurfer. Brain age was estimated from 77 subcortical and cortical regions with a publicly available ENIGMA brain age model. The brain-predicted age difference (brain-PAD) was calculated as brain age minus chronological age. Linear mixed-effects models examined group differences in brain-PAD and moderation by age. No significant group difference in brain-PAD manifested (βdiagnosis [SE] = 0.37 years [0.43], p = 0.39). A negative diagnosis-by-age interaction was identified, which was most pronounced in formally diagnosed SPH (βdiagnosis-by-age = −0.08 [0.03], pFDR = 0.02). This interaction remained significant when excluding participants with anxiety comorbidities, depressive comorbidities, and medication use. Post hoc analyses revealed a group difference for formal SPH diagnosis in younger participants (22–35 years; βdiagnosis = 1.20 [0.60], p < 0.05, mixed-effects d [95% confidence interval] = 0.14 [0.00–0.28]), but not older participants (36–75 years; βdiagnosis = 0.07 [0.65], p = 0.91). Brain aging did not relate to SPH in the full sample. However, a diagnosis-by-age interaction was observed across analyses, and was strongest in formally diagnosed SPH. Post hoc analyses showed subtle advanced brain aging in young adults with formally diagnosed SPH. Taken together, these findings indicate the importance of clinical severity, impairment, and persistence, and may suggest a slightly earlier end to maturational processes or subtle decline of brain structure in SPH.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere70595
JournalHuman Brain Mapping
Volume47
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Author(s). Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Keywords

  • brain age
  • brain morphometry
  • machine learning
  • mega-analysis
  • neuroimaging
  • phobic disorders

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Meta-Analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Brain Aging in Specific Phobia: An ENIGMA-Anxiety Mega-Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this