Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Bone Graft Options, Graft Substitutes, and Harvest Techniques

  • Kristen E Jones
  • , David W. Polly

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Successful spine fusion demands careful consideration of bone graft options and meticulous techniques for harvest and arthrodesis. To select the appropriate graft material, spine surgeons must have a working understanding of the factors affecting bone graft healing including osteogenicity, osteoinduction, and osteoconduction, as well as differential healing of cancellous versus cortical grafts. To formulate the appropriate arthrodesis strategy for each patient, the surgeon must weigh individualized patient biologic factors and risks, benefits, and costs of autograft, allograft, and synthetic bone graft substitutes. In patients without biologic obstacles to fusion, such as osteoporosis, diabetes, and steroid use, maximal use of local harvest autograft is suggested, with consideration for remote harvest autograft versus bone graft extenders and enhancers dependent on surgical approach and patient comorbidities. Attention to detail during arthrodesis with meticulous soft tissue removal and decortication of intended fusion surfaces with adequate grafting is necessary.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationYoumans and Winn Neurological Surgery
Subtitle of host publicationVolumes 1-4, 8th Edition
PublisherElsevier
Pages2779-2784.e2
ISBN (Electronic)9780323661928
ISBN (Print)9780323674997
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • bone graft technique
  • spine arthrodesis
  • spine autograft harvest

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bone Graft Options, Graft Substitutes, and Harvest Techniques'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this