TY - JOUR
T1 - Bond strength of six dentinal adhesives
AU - Holtan, J. R.
AU - Nystrom, G. P.
AU - Olin, P. S.
AU - Phelps, R. A.
AU - Phillips, J. J.
AU - Douglas, W. H.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2014 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1994/4
Y1 - 1994/4
N2 - This study compared the shear bond strengths on dentine of five dentine adhesives against Scotchbond 2 as a control. Dentine specimens from 225 extracted human permanent molar teeth were used in a matched-pair design, such that 45 tooth sides were treated along with the matching control for each of the five test materials. Shear bond strength testing was conducted 24 h after the completion of each specimen. Results showed that mean force (MPa) for the materials were: XR Bond, 17.1 ± 5.1; Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, 15.9 ± 6.5; Syntac, 13.5 ± 8.6; All-Bond 2, 6.2 ± 4.1; Scotchbond 2 (control composite score), 4.9 ± 3.0; Denthesive, 3.4 ± 1.7. Matched pair Mest comparisons with Scotchbond 2 control were: XR Bond, P = 0.0005; Scotchbond MultiPurpose, P = 0.0005; Syntac, P = 0.0005; All-Bond 2, P = 0.0368; Denthesive, P = 0.005. Analysis of variance determined a statistically significant difference (P = 0.05) between the means of the bond strengths, which fell into four groups: Group A, XR Bond and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose; Group B, Syntac; Group C, All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond 2; Group D, Scotchbond 2 and Denthesive. In Group C, there was no significant difference between Scotchbond 2 and All-Bond 2. In Group D there was no significant difference between Scotchbond 2 and Denthesive, however, there was significant difference between All-Bond 2 and Denthesive. It was concluded that XR Bond and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose had significantly better shear bond strength than the other dentine adhesives.
AB - This study compared the shear bond strengths on dentine of five dentine adhesives against Scotchbond 2 as a control. Dentine specimens from 225 extracted human permanent molar teeth were used in a matched-pair design, such that 45 tooth sides were treated along with the matching control for each of the five test materials. Shear bond strength testing was conducted 24 h after the completion of each specimen. Results showed that mean force (MPa) for the materials were: XR Bond, 17.1 ± 5.1; Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, 15.9 ± 6.5; Syntac, 13.5 ± 8.6; All-Bond 2, 6.2 ± 4.1; Scotchbond 2 (control composite score), 4.9 ± 3.0; Denthesive, 3.4 ± 1.7. Matched pair Mest comparisons with Scotchbond 2 control were: XR Bond, P = 0.0005; Scotchbond MultiPurpose, P = 0.0005; Syntac, P = 0.0005; All-Bond 2, P = 0.0368; Denthesive, P = 0.005. Analysis of variance determined a statistically significant difference (P = 0.05) between the means of the bond strengths, which fell into four groups: Group A, XR Bond and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose; Group B, Syntac; Group C, All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond 2; Group D, Scotchbond 2 and Denthesive. In Group C, there was no significant difference between Scotchbond 2 and All-Bond 2. In Group D there was no significant difference between Scotchbond 2 and Denthesive, however, there was significant difference between All-Bond 2 and Denthesive. It was concluded that XR Bond and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose had significantly better shear bond strength than the other dentine adhesives.
KW - Bond strength
KW - Dentine
KW - Dentine adhesives
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028418044&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028418044&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0300-5712(94)90008-6
DO - 10.1016/0300-5712(94)90008-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 8195482
AN - SCOPUS:0028418044
SN - 0300-5712
VL - 22
SP - 92
EP - 96
JO - Journal of Dentistry
JF - Journal of Dentistry
IS - 2
ER -