Bond strength and nanoroughness assessment on human pretreated cementum surfaces

M. Toledano, E. Osorio, F. S. Aguilera, G. Gomes, Jorge Perdigao, R. Osorio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the bond strength of seven adhesive systems to human cementum, and to assess the promoted surface roughness. Methods: Extracted human canines were used for the present study. The mesial surface from the cervical third of the roots were ground flat with wet 600-grit silicon carbide paper and bonded. Seven adhesive systems were employed: an etch-and-rinse adhesive (Single Bond), two two-step self-etching (Clearfil SE Bond and Resulcin Aquaprime) and four one-step self-etching (One-up Bond F, Prompt-L-Pop, Etch and Prime 3.0 and NRC+Prime&Bond NT). Composite build-ups were constructed and stored in a humid environment for 24 h at 37 °C. Specimens were sectioned into 1 mm2 beams and tested for microtensile bond strength (MTBS). Additional surfaces were conditioned for atomic force microscopy (AFM) analysis. Results were analyzed with ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls tests (P < 0.05). Results: Single Bond showed the highest MTBS values. No differences were found between Resulcin Aquaprime, One-up Bond and Prompt-L-Pop. Clearfil SE Bond, Etch and Prime and NRC+Prime&Bond NT obtained the lowest bond strength values. H3PO4 acid treatment of cementum and Resulcin Aquaprime showed the highest nanoroughness parameters and One-up Bond the lowest. Conclusion: The etch-and-rinse adhesive and the two-step self-etching adhesive with the lowest pH value promoted the highest bond strength to human cementum surfaces.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)678-685
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Dentistry
Volume38
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2010

Fingerprint

Dental Cementum
Adhesives
Atomic Force Microscopy
Canidae
Analysis of Variance
Students
Acids
Resulcin aquaPrime

Keywords

  • AFM
  • Adhesion
  • Adhesives
  • Cementum
  • Dental
  • Etching
  • Nanoroughness
  • Phosphoric acid
  • Self-etching
  • Surface

Cite this

Bond strength and nanoroughness assessment on human pretreated cementum surfaces. / Toledano, M.; Osorio, E.; Aguilera, F. S.; Gomes, G.; Perdigao, Jorge; Osorio, R.

In: Journal of Dentistry, Vol. 38, No. 8, 01.08.2010, p. 678-685.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Toledano, M. ; Osorio, E. ; Aguilera, F. S. ; Gomes, G. ; Perdigao, Jorge ; Osorio, R. / Bond strength and nanoroughness assessment on human pretreated cementum surfaces. In: Journal of Dentistry. 2010 ; Vol. 38, No. 8. pp. 678-685.
@article{1338d0af2853459cab1a142f24bc99f0,
title = "Bond strength and nanoroughness assessment on human pretreated cementum surfaces",
abstract = "Objectives: To determine the bond strength of seven adhesive systems to human cementum, and to assess the promoted surface roughness. Methods: Extracted human canines were used for the present study. The mesial surface from the cervical third of the roots were ground flat with wet 600-grit silicon carbide paper and bonded. Seven adhesive systems were employed: an etch-and-rinse adhesive (Single Bond), two two-step self-etching (Clearfil SE Bond and Resulcin Aquaprime) and four one-step self-etching (One-up Bond F, Prompt-L-Pop, Etch and Prime 3.0 and NRC+Prime&Bond NT). Composite build-ups were constructed and stored in a humid environment for 24 h at 37 °C. Specimens were sectioned into 1 mm2 beams and tested for microtensile bond strength (MTBS). Additional surfaces were conditioned for atomic force microscopy (AFM) analysis. Results were analyzed with ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls tests (P < 0.05). Results: Single Bond showed the highest MTBS values. No differences were found between Resulcin Aquaprime, One-up Bond and Prompt-L-Pop. Clearfil SE Bond, Etch and Prime and NRC+Prime&Bond NT obtained the lowest bond strength values. H3PO4 acid treatment of cementum and Resulcin Aquaprime showed the highest nanoroughness parameters and One-up Bond the lowest. Conclusion: The etch-and-rinse adhesive and the two-step self-etching adhesive with the lowest pH value promoted the highest bond strength to human cementum surfaces.",
keywords = "AFM, Adhesion, Adhesives, Cementum, Dental, Etching, Nanoroughness, Phosphoric acid, Self-etching, Surface",
author = "M. Toledano and E. Osorio and Aguilera, {F. S.} and G. Gomes and Jorge Perdigao and R. Osorio",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "678--685",
journal = "Journal of Dentistry",
issn = "0300-5712",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bond strength and nanoroughness assessment on human pretreated cementum surfaces

AU - Toledano, M.

AU - Osorio, E.

AU - Aguilera, F. S.

AU - Gomes, G.

AU - Perdigao, Jorge

AU - Osorio, R.

PY - 2010/8/1

Y1 - 2010/8/1

N2 - Objectives: To determine the bond strength of seven adhesive systems to human cementum, and to assess the promoted surface roughness. Methods: Extracted human canines were used for the present study. The mesial surface from the cervical third of the roots were ground flat with wet 600-grit silicon carbide paper and bonded. Seven adhesive systems were employed: an etch-and-rinse adhesive (Single Bond), two two-step self-etching (Clearfil SE Bond and Resulcin Aquaprime) and four one-step self-etching (One-up Bond F, Prompt-L-Pop, Etch and Prime 3.0 and NRC+Prime&Bond NT). Composite build-ups were constructed and stored in a humid environment for 24 h at 37 °C. Specimens were sectioned into 1 mm2 beams and tested for microtensile bond strength (MTBS). Additional surfaces were conditioned for atomic force microscopy (AFM) analysis. Results were analyzed with ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls tests (P < 0.05). Results: Single Bond showed the highest MTBS values. No differences were found between Resulcin Aquaprime, One-up Bond and Prompt-L-Pop. Clearfil SE Bond, Etch and Prime and NRC+Prime&Bond NT obtained the lowest bond strength values. H3PO4 acid treatment of cementum and Resulcin Aquaprime showed the highest nanoroughness parameters and One-up Bond the lowest. Conclusion: The etch-and-rinse adhesive and the two-step self-etching adhesive with the lowest pH value promoted the highest bond strength to human cementum surfaces.

AB - Objectives: To determine the bond strength of seven adhesive systems to human cementum, and to assess the promoted surface roughness. Methods: Extracted human canines were used for the present study. The mesial surface from the cervical third of the roots were ground flat with wet 600-grit silicon carbide paper and bonded. Seven adhesive systems were employed: an etch-and-rinse adhesive (Single Bond), two two-step self-etching (Clearfil SE Bond and Resulcin Aquaprime) and four one-step self-etching (One-up Bond F, Prompt-L-Pop, Etch and Prime 3.0 and NRC+Prime&Bond NT). Composite build-ups were constructed and stored in a humid environment for 24 h at 37 °C. Specimens were sectioned into 1 mm2 beams and tested for microtensile bond strength (MTBS). Additional surfaces were conditioned for atomic force microscopy (AFM) analysis. Results were analyzed with ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls tests (P < 0.05). Results: Single Bond showed the highest MTBS values. No differences were found between Resulcin Aquaprime, One-up Bond and Prompt-L-Pop. Clearfil SE Bond, Etch and Prime and NRC+Prime&Bond NT obtained the lowest bond strength values. H3PO4 acid treatment of cementum and Resulcin Aquaprime showed the highest nanoroughness parameters and One-up Bond the lowest. Conclusion: The etch-and-rinse adhesive and the two-step self-etching adhesive with the lowest pH value promoted the highest bond strength to human cementum surfaces.

KW - AFM

KW - Adhesion

KW - Adhesives

KW - Cementum

KW - Dental

KW - Etching

KW - Nanoroughness

KW - Phosphoric acid

KW - Self-etching

KW - Surface

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953690751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953690751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.011

DO - 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.011

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 678

EP - 685

JO - Journal of Dentistry

JF - Journal of Dentistry

SN - 0300-5712

IS - 8

ER -