Blood flow characteristics of ovarian tumors: Implications for ovarian cancer screening

Jonathan R. Carter, Manbot Lau, Jeffrey M. Fowler, Jay W. Carlson, Linda F Carson, Leo B. Twiggs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

56 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to investigate the blood flow characteristics of benign and malignant ovarian tumors. Questions posed by our research were as follows: (1) Can malignant ovarian tumors be predicted by color flow Doppler imaging? (2) What are the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of such prediction? (3) Which color flow Doppler parameter is superior in its accuracy of prediction? STUDY DESIGN: One hundred twenty-three consecutive patients seen for suspected pelvic masses were evaluated by transvaginal ultrasonography and color flow Doppler imaging. A morphologic assessment was initially performed, followed by color flow Doppler anlaysis. A comparison of findings between the benign and malignant tumors was made by analyzing different thresholds of the intratumoral pulsatility and resistance index values by means of receiver-operator characteristic curves. By calculation of the area index under each receiver-operator characteristic curve the efficiency of the pulsatility and resistance index values in predicting malignancy was determined. RESULTS: Fifty-six benign and 23 malignant tumors were pathologically confirmed. Patients with malignant tumors were not likely to be postmenopausal and were older than patients with benign tumors. Malignant tumors were more likely to be larger and to have either a complex or solid pattern. Absent color flow was more common in benign tumors, and increased color flow was found equally among benign and malignant tumors. There was no difference in systolic, diastolic, or mean velocities between benign and malignant tumors. The calculated pulsatility and resistance index values were lower in patients with malignant tumors compared with those with benign tumors. No significant difference exists in performance of either the pulsatility or resistance index of 1.0 and resistance index of 0.6. CONCLUSIONS: Transvaginal ultrasonography is accurate is distinguishing benign from malignant ovarian tumors. Color flow Doppler findings are not specific enough to be used independent of gray-scale ultrasonography.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)901-907
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology
Volume172
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1995

Keywords

  • Transvaginal ultrasonography
  • color flow Doppler imaging
  • ovarian cancer screening

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Blood flow characteristics of ovarian tumors: Implications for ovarian cancer screening'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this