Black Gold, Green Earth: An Analysis of the Petroleum Industry's CSR Environmental Sustainability Discourse

Amy O'Connor, Katherine L. Gronewold

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examines 21 environmental sustainability reports from Fortune Global 500 petroleum companies to determine how competitive advantage and institutional language is used by corporations to explain their corporate social responsibility (CSR). Results suggest the environmental sustainability discourse of the world's largest petroleum companies contains both institutional and competitive advantage language. Also, results indicate that corporations blend the two forms of CSR communication to create a comprehensive environmental CSR profile that simultaneously enhances their position within the industrial field and offers buffering protection due to intraindustry homogeneity. Competitive advantage language is used to describe the quality, scope, and innovation of their environmental CSR as superior to other companies within their industry, particularly when communicating about technology and innovations regarding conservation efforts and manufacturing processes. Institutional language is used to describe governmental regulations and laws, industry standards for CSR reporting and expenditures, and type of CSR initiatives and partnerships. Finally, the form CSR communication takes is deeply contextualized by industry and institutional pressures as well as organizational idiosyncrasies thereby challenging the universality of CSR initiatives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)210-236
Number of pages27
JournalManagement Communication Quarterly
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2013

Fingerprint

petroleum industry
Petroleum industry
social responsibility
gold
Sustainable development
Gold
Earth (planet)
sustainability
discourse
Industry
language
industry
corporation
Crude oil
Innovation
innovation
Corporate Social Responsibility
Environmental sustainability
Discourse
communication

Keywords

  • corporate communication
  • corporate social responsibility
  • institutional theory
  • organizational communication

Cite this

Black Gold, Green Earth : An Analysis of the Petroleum Industry's CSR Environmental Sustainability Discourse. / O'Connor, Amy; Gronewold, Katherine L.

In: Management Communication Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 2, 01.05.2013, p. 210-236.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b2f70d1f7fd9468ca26211131dc2e190,
title = "Black Gold, Green Earth: An Analysis of the Petroleum Industry's CSR Environmental Sustainability Discourse",
abstract = "This study examines 21 environmental sustainability reports from Fortune Global 500 petroleum companies to determine how competitive advantage and institutional language is used by corporations to explain their corporate social responsibility (CSR). Results suggest the environmental sustainability discourse of the world's largest petroleum companies contains both institutional and competitive advantage language. Also, results indicate that corporations blend the two forms of CSR communication to create a comprehensive environmental CSR profile that simultaneously enhances their position within the industrial field and offers buffering protection due to intraindustry homogeneity. Competitive advantage language is used to describe the quality, scope, and innovation of their environmental CSR as superior to other companies within their industry, particularly when communicating about technology and innovations regarding conservation efforts and manufacturing processes. Institutional language is used to describe governmental regulations and laws, industry standards for CSR reporting and expenditures, and type of CSR initiatives and partnerships. Finally, the form CSR communication takes is deeply contextualized by industry and institutional pressures as well as organizational idiosyncrasies thereby challenging the universality of CSR initiatives.",
keywords = "corporate communication, corporate social responsibility, institutional theory, organizational communication",
author = "Amy O'Connor and Gronewold, {Katherine L.}",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0893318912465189",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "210--236",
journal = "Management Communication Quarterly",
issn = "0893-3189",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Black Gold, Green Earth

T2 - An Analysis of the Petroleum Industry's CSR Environmental Sustainability Discourse

AU - O'Connor, Amy

AU - Gronewold, Katherine L.

PY - 2013/5/1

Y1 - 2013/5/1

N2 - This study examines 21 environmental sustainability reports from Fortune Global 500 petroleum companies to determine how competitive advantage and institutional language is used by corporations to explain their corporate social responsibility (CSR). Results suggest the environmental sustainability discourse of the world's largest petroleum companies contains both institutional and competitive advantage language. Also, results indicate that corporations blend the two forms of CSR communication to create a comprehensive environmental CSR profile that simultaneously enhances their position within the industrial field and offers buffering protection due to intraindustry homogeneity. Competitive advantage language is used to describe the quality, scope, and innovation of their environmental CSR as superior to other companies within their industry, particularly when communicating about technology and innovations regarding conservation efforts and manufacturing processes. Institutional language is used to describe governmental regulations and laws, industry standards for CSR reporting and expenditures, and type of CSR initiatives and partnerships. Finally, the form CSR communication takes is deeply contextualized by industry and institutional pressures as well as organizational idiosyncrasies thereby challenging the universality of CSR initiatives.

AB - This study examines 21 environmental sustainability reports from Fortune Global 500 petroleum companies to determine how competitive advantage and institutional language is used by corporations to explain their corporate social responsibility (CSR). Results suggest the environmental sustainability discourse of the world's largest petroleum companies contains both institutional and competitive advantage language. Also, results indicate that corporations blend the two forms of CSR communication to create a comprehensive environmental CSR profile that simultaneously enhances their position within the industrial field and offers buffering protection due to intraindustry homogeneity. Competitive advantage language is used to describe the quality, scope, and innovation of their environmental CSR as superior to other companies within their industry, particularly when communicating about technology and innovations regarding conservation efforts and manufacturing processes. Institutional language is used to describe governmental regulations and laws, industry standards for CSR reporting and expenditures, and type of CSR initiatives and partnerships. Finally, the form CSR communication takes is deeply contextualized by industry and institutional pressures as well as organizational idiosyncrasies thereby challenging the universality of CSR initiatives.

KW - corporate communication

KW - corporate social responsibility

KW - institutional theory

KW - organizational communication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876074449&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876074449&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0893318912465189

DO - 10.1177/0893318912465189

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84876074449

VL - 27

SP - 210

EP - 236

JO - Management Communication Quarterly

JF - Management Communication Quarterly

SN - 0893-3189

IS - 2

ER -