Biotic interactions and plant invasions

Charles E. Mitchell, Anurag A. Agrawal, James D. Bever, Gregory S. Gilbert, Ruth A. Hufbauer, John N. Klironomos, John L. Maron, William F. Morris, Ingrid M. Parker, Alison G. Power, Eric W. Seabloom, Mark E. Torchin, Diego P. Vázquez

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

502 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduced plant populations lose interactions with enemies, mutualists and competitors from their native ranges, and gain interactions with new species, under new abiotic conditions. From a biogeographical perspective, differences in the assemblage of interacting species, as well as in abiotic conditions, may explain the demographic success of the introduced plant populations relative to conspecifics in their native range. Within invaded communities, the new interactions and conditions experienced by the invader may influence both its demographic success and its effects on native biodiversity. Here, we examine indirect effects involving enemies, mutualists and competitors of introduced plants, and effects of abiotic conditions on biotic interactions. We then synthesize ideas building on Darwin's idea that the kinds of new interactions gained by an introduced population will depend on its relatedness to native populations. This yields a heuristic framework to explain how biotic interactions and abiotic conditions influence invader success. We conclude that species introductions generally alter plants' interactions with enemies, mutualists and competitors, and that there is increasing evidence that these altered interactions jointly influence the success of introduced populations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)726-740
Number of pages15
JournalEcology letters
Volume9
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2006

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Biotic interactions and plant invasions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this