Biomarkers of Nutrition for Development (BOND)-Iron review

Sean Lynch, Christine M. Pfeiffer, Michael K Georgieff, Gary Brittenham, Susan Fairweather-Tait, Richard F. Hurrell, Harry J. McArdle, Daniel J. Raiten

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This is the fifth in the series of reviews developed as part of the Biomarkers of Nutrition for Development (BOND) program. The BOND Iron Expert Panel (I-EP) reviewed the extant knowledge regarding iron biology, public health implications, and the relative usefulness of currently available biomarkers of iron status from deficiency to overload. Approaches to assessing intake, including bioavailability, are also covered. The report also covers technical and laboratory considerations for the use of available biomarkers of iron status, and concludes with a description of research priorities along with a brief discussion of new biomarkers with potential for use across the spectrum of activities related to the study of iron in human health. The I-EP concluded that current iron biomarkers are reliable for accurately assessing many aspects of iron nutrition. However, a clear distinction is made between the relative strengths of biomarkers to assess hematological consequences of iron deficiency versus other putative functional outcomes, particularly the relationship between maternal and fetal iron status during pregnancy, birth outcomes, and infant cognitive, motor and emotional development. The I-EP also highlighted the importance of considering the confounding effects of inflammation and infection on the interpretation of iron biomarker results, as well as the impact of life stage. Finally, alternative approaches to the evaluation of the risk for nutritional iron overload at the population level are presented, because the currently designated upper limits for the biomarker generally employed (serum ferritin) may not differentiate between true iron overload and the effects of subclinical inflammation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1001S-1067S
JournalJournal of Nutrition
Volume148
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018

Fingerprint

Iron
Biomarkers
Iron Overload
Inflammation
Pregnancy Outcome
Ferritins
Biological Availability
Public Health
Mothers
Parturition
Health
Infection
Serum
Research

Keywords

  • Iron
  • Iron biology
  • Iron biomarkers
  • Iron nutrition
  • Iron status assessment

Cite this

Lynch, S., Pfeiffer, C. M., Georgieff, M. K., Brittenham, G., Fairweather-Tait, S., Hurrell, R. F., ... Raiten, D. J. (2018). Biomarkers of Nutrition for Development (BOND)-Iron review. Journal of Nutrition, 148, 1001S-1067S. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxx036

Biomarkers of Nutrition for Development (BOND)-Iron review. / Lynch, Sean; Pfeiffer, Christine M.; Georgieff, Michael K; Brittenham, Gary; Fairweather-Tait, Susan; Hurrell, Richard F.; McArdle, Harry J.; Raiten, Daniel J.

In: Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 148, 01.06.2018, p. 1001S-1067S.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Lynch, S, Pfeiffer, CM, Georgieff, MK, Brittenham, G, Fairweather-Tait, S, Hurrell, RF, McArdle, HJ & Raiten, DJ 2018, 'Biomarkers of Nutrition for Development (BOND)-Iron review', Journal of Nutrition, vol. 148, pp. 1001S-1067S. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxx036
Lynch S, Pfeiffer CM, Georgieff MK, Brittenham G, Fairweather-Tait S, Hurrell RF et al. Biomarkers of Nutrition for Development (BOND)-Iron review. Journal of Nutrition. 2018 Jun 1;148:1001S-1067S. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxx036
Lynch, Sean ; Pfeiffer, Christine M. ; Georgieff, Michael K ; Brittenham, Gary ; Fairweather-Tait, Susan ; Hurrell, Richard F. ; McArdle, Harry J. ; Raiten, Daniel J. / Biomarkers of Nutrition for Development (BOND)-Iron review. In: Journal of Nutrition. 2018 ; Vol. 148. pp. 1001S-1067S.
@article{342d7ddc495c42a2bb6aa875c5c590ad,
title = "Biomarkers of Nutrition for Development (BOND)-Iron review",
abstract = "This is the fifth in the series of reviews developed as part of the Biomarkers of Nutrition for Development (BOND) program. The BOND Iron Expert Panel (I-EP) reviewed the extant knowledge regarding iron biology, public health implications, and the relative usefulness of currently available biomarkers of iron status from deficiency to overload. Approaches to assessing intake, including bioavailability, are also covered. The report also covers technical and laboratory considerations for the use of available biomarkers of iron status, and concludes with a description of research priorities along with a brief discussion of new biomarkers with potential for use across the spectrum of activities related to the study of iron in human health. The I-EP concluded that current iron biomarkers are reliable for accurately assessing many aspects of iron nutrition. However, a clear distinction is made between the relative strengths of biomarkers to assess hematological consequences of iron deficiency versus other putative functional outcomes, particularly the relationship between maternal and fetal iron status during pregnancy, birth outcomes, and infant cognitive, motor and emotional development. The I-EP also highlighted the importance of considering the confounding effects of inflammation and infection on the interpretation of iron biomarker results, as well as the impact of life stage. Finally, alternative approaches to the evaluation of the risk for nutritional iron overload at the population level are presented, because the currently designated upper limits for the biomarker generally employed (serum ferritin) may not differentiate between true iron overload and the effects of subclinical inflammation.",
keywords = "Iron, Iron biology, Iron biomarkers, Iron nutrition, Iron status assessment",
author = "Sean Lynch and Pfeiffer, {Christine M.} and Georgieff, {Michael K} and Gary Brittenham and Susan Fairweather-Tait and Hurrell, {Richard F.} and McArdle, {Harry J.} and Raiten, {Daniel J.}",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/jn/nxx036",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "148",
pages = "1001S--1067S",
journal = "Journal of Nutrition",
issn = "0022-3166",
publisher = "American Society for Nutrition",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biomarkers of Nutrition for Development (BOND)-Iron review

AU - Lynch, Sean

AU - Pfeiffer, Christine M.

AU - Georgieff, Michael K

AU - Brittenham, Gary

AU - Fairweather-Tait, Susan

AU - Hurrell, Richard F.

AU - McArdle, Harry J.

AU - Raiten, Daniel J.

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - This is the fifth in the series of reviews developed as part of the Biomarkers of Nutrition for Development (BOND) program. The BOND Iron Expert Panel (I-EP) reviewed the extant knowledge regarding iron biology, public health implications, and the relative usefulness of currently available biomarkers of iron status from deficiency to overload. Approaches to assessing intake, including bioavailability, are also covered. The report also covers technical and laboratory considerations for the use of available biomarkers of iron status, and concludes with a description of research priorities along with a brief discussion of new biomarkers with potential for use across the spectrum of activities related to the study of iron in human health. The I-EP concluded that current iron biomarkers are reliable for accurately assessing many aspects of iron nutrition. However, a clear distinction is made between the relative strengths of biomarkers to assess hematological consequences of iron deficiency versus other putative functional outcomes, particularly the relationship between maternal and fetal iron status during pregnancy, birth outcomes, and infant cognitive, motor and emotional development. The I-EP also highlighted the importance of considering the confounding effects of inflammation and infection on the interpretation of iron biomarker results, as well as the impact of life stage. Finally, alternative approaches to the evaluation of the risk for nutritional iron overload at the population level are presented, because the currently designated upper limits for the biomarker generally employed (serum ferritin) may not differentiate between true iron overload and the effects of subclinical inflammation.

AB - This is the fifth in the series of reviews developed as part of the Biomarkers of Nutrition for Development (BOND) program. The BOND Iron Expert Panel (I-EP) reviewed the extant knowledge regarding iron biology, public health implications, and the relative usefulness of currently available biomarkers of iron status from deficiency to overload. Approaches to assessing intake, including bioavailability, are also covered. The report also covers technical and laboratory considerations for the use of available biomarkers of iron status, and concludes with a description of research priorities along with a brief discussion of new biomarkers with potential for use across the spectrum of activities related to the study of iron in human health. The I-EP concluded that current iron biomarkers are reliable for accurately assessing many aspects of iron nutrition. However, a clear distinction is made between the relative strengths of biomarkers to assess hematological consequences of iron deficiency versus other putative functional outcomes, particularly the relationship between maternal and fetal iron status during pregnancy, birth outcomes, and infant cognitive, motor and emotional development. The I-EP also highlighted the importance of considering the confounding effects of inflammation and infection on the interpretation of iron biomarker results, as well as the impact of life stage. Finally, alternative approaches to the evaluation of the risk for nutritional iron overload at the population level are presented, because the currently designated upper limits for the biomarker generally employed (serum ferritin) may not differentiate between true iron overload and the effects of subclinical inflammation.

KW - Iron

KW - Iron biology

KW - Iron biomarkers

KW - Iron nutrition

KW - Iron status assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048536493&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048536493&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jn/nxx036

DO - 10.1093/jn/nxx036

M3 - Review article

VL - 148

SP - 1001S-1067S

JO - Journal of Nutrition

JF - Journal of Nutrition

SN - 0022-3166

ER -