Abstract
Political theorists have increasingly adopted the psychoanalytic language of 'mourning' to characterize experiences of loss and injury, and to legitimate these as claims about a past political or cultural order. Mourning would seek to work through these experiences while opening persons to their shared vulnerabilities. With this article, I return to Freud's original distinction between mourning and melancholia, along with its development through the work of Donald Winnicott and the relational school of psychoanalysis. Although psychoanalytic mourning balances a coming-to-terms with loss against investment in new social relations, when it is extrapolated to a broader community it risks over-determining the social field. The cost is a foreclosure of other modalities for articulating claims about injury and political order, and in particular those that might draw on anger as a resource for political action and solidarity.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 139-159 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Contemporary Political Theory |
Volume | 15 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 1 2016 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2016 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
Keywords
- Freud
- Judith Butler
- Winnicott
- anger
- mourning
- psychoanalysis