Between Knowledge and Practice: How Youth Justice Practitioners in a US Urban Setting Navigate Developmental Science in Collaborative Decision-Making

Keyphrases

• United States 100%
• Collaborative Decision Making 100%
• Urban Setting 100%
• Youth Justice 100%
• Developmental Science 100%
• Juvenile Justice 66%
• Knowledge Practices 33%
• Access to Information 33%
• Social Context 33%
• Environmental Influence 33%
• Restorative Justice 33%
• Adolescent Development 33%
• Needs Assessment 33%
• Structured Interview 33%
• Community Members 33%
• Decision-making Process 33%
• Information Gap 33%
• Psychosocial Development 33%
• Recurring 33%
• Acuity 33%
• Application in Practice 33%
• Professional Experience 33%
• Making Inferences 33%
• Developmental Needs 33%
• Speculating 33%
• Complex Approach 33%
• Collaborative Review 33%
• Prosecutors 33%
• Making Decisions 33%
• Development Justice 33%
• Juvenile Justice System 33%
• Review Team 33%
• Attorneys 33%
• Restorative Approaches 33%
• Public Defenders 33%

Social Sciences

• Collaboration 100%
• USA 100%
• Justice 100%
• Decision Making 100%
• Juvenile Justice 75%
• Adolescent Development 25%
• Qualitative Research 25%
• Need Development 25%
• Professional Experience 25%
• Semi-Structured Interview 25%
• Qualitative Method 25%
• Decision-Making Process 25%
• Psychosocial Development 25%
• Community Member 25%
• Youth 25%
• Adolescent 25%

Psychology

• Decision Making 100%
• United States of America 100%
• Adolescence 50%
• Qualitative Method 25%
• Qualitative Study 25%
• Semistructured Interview 25%
• Adolescent Development 25%
• Psychosocial Development 25%
• Decision-Making Process 25%
• Qualitative Research 25%