Abstract
The evidence base supporting the use of most interventions consists primarily of data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), but how and to whom interventions are delivered in clinical practice may differ substantially from these foundational RCTs. With the increasing availability of electronic health data, it is now feasible to study the “real-world” effectiveness of a wide range of interventions. However, real-world intervention effectiveness studies using electronic health data face many challenges including data quality, selection bias, confounding by indication, and lack of generalizability. In this article, we describe the key barriers to generating high-quality evidence from real-world intervention effectiveness studies and suggest statistical best practices for addressing them.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 13-22 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | American Journal of Clinical Nutrition |
Volume | 118 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs |
|
State | Published - Jul 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023 American Society for Nutrition
Keywords
- causal inference
- electronic health records
- generalizability
- intervention effectiveness
- real-world evidence
- statistical best practices
PubMed: MeSH publication types
- Journal Article