TY - JOUR
T1 - Benefits of colorectal cancer screening using fecal immunochemical testing with varying positivity thresholds by age and sex
AU - Harlass, Matthias
AU - Knudsen, Amy B.
AU - Nieboer, Daan
AU - Van Duuren, Luuk A.
AU - Kuntz, Karen M.
AU - Rutter, Carolyn M.
AU - Nascimento De Lima, Pedro
AU - Collier, Nicholson
AU - Ozik, Jonathan
AU - Hahn, Anne I.
AU - Alarid-Escudero, Fernando
AU - Zauber, Ann G.
AU - Inadomi, John M.
AU - Meester, Reinier G.S.
AU - Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s).
PY - 2025/11/1
Y1 - 2025/11/1
N2 - Background Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) performance for colorectal cancer screening varies by age and sex, yet most FIT-based screening programs use uniform positivity thresholds. This study assessed the potential benefits of stratifying FIT thresholds based on age and sex. Methods We conducted a meta-analysis of FIT sensitivity and specificity at various positivity thresholds by age and sex. We then used these estimates in 2 microsimulation models of colorectal cancer and projected lifetime clinical outcomes, incremental costs, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained from age- and sex-stratified FIT strategies. FIT thresholds ranged from 10 to 50 µg hemoglobin per gram of feces. Results For current uniform FIT screening (20 µg hemoglobin/gram of feces), models projected 85.67 to 122.15 QALYs gained at incremental costs of $982 to $504 per 1000 individuals compared with no screening. At equivalent costs to current uniform screening, only 1 model found stratified FIT approaches cost-effective, yielding a marginal increase of 1.04 and 1.10 QALYs gained/1000 female and male individuals, respectively. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/QALYs gained, both models found stratified FIT cutoffs to be the best strategy, with cutoffs being equal to or higher for males and lowest at older ages (70-75 years). Uniform strategies showed comparable effectiveness, falling within 1 quality-adjusted life-day per person of efficient strategies at up to $112 more per person. Results were sensitive to FIT test performance characteristics and 1-time setup costs. Conclusion Stratifying FIT thresholds by age and sex may be cost-effective compared to current screening. The gain in expected health benefits with stratified FIT screening, however, is likely small.
AB - Background Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) performance for colorectal cancer screening varies by age and sex, yet most FIT-based screening programs use uniform positivity thresholds. This study assessed the potential benefits of stratifying FIT thresholds based on age and sex. Methods We conducted a meta-analysis of FIT sensitivity and specificity at various positivity thresholds by age and sex. We then used these estimates in 2 microsimulation models of colorectal cancer and projected lifetime clinical outcomes, incremental costs, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained from age- and sex-stratified FIT strategies. FIT thresholds ranged from 10 to 50 µg hemoglobin per gram of feces. Results For current uniform FIT screening (20 µg hemoglobin/gram of feces), models projected 85.67 to 122.15 QALYs gained at incremental costs of $982 to $504 per 1000 individuals compared with no screening. At equivalent costs to current uniform screening, only 1 model found stratified FIT approaches cost-effective, yielding a marginal increase of 1.04 and 1.10 QALYs gained/1000 female and male individuals, respectively. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/QALYs gained, both models found stratified FIT cutoffs to be the best strategy, with cutoffs being equal to or higher for males and lowest at older ages (70-75 years). Uniform strategies showed comparable effectiveness, falling within 1 quality-adjusted life-day per person of efficient strategies at up to $112 more per person. Results were sensitive to FIT test performance characteristics and 1-time setup costs. Conclusion Stratifying FIT thresholds by age and sex may be cost-effective compared to current screening. The gain in expected health benefits with stratified FIT screening, however, is likely small.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105021228375
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105021228375#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1093/jnci/djaf149
DO - 10.1093/jnci/djaf149
M3 - Article
C2 - 40581741
AN - SCOPUS:105021228375
SN - 0027-8874
VL - 117
SP - 2219
EP - 2228
JO - Journal of the National Cancer Institute
JF - Journal of the National Cancer Institute
IS - 11
ER -