Behavioral Impact of Return of Genetic Test Results for Complex Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Maia J. Frieser, Sylia Wilson, Scott I Vrieze

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Advances in genomewide association studies have made possible the return of genetic risk results for complex diseases. Two concerns about these results are (a) negative psychological consequences and (b) viewing probabilistic results as deterministic, leading to misinterpretation and inappropriate decisions. The present study evaluates these concerns through a meta-analytic review of existing literature. Method: Seventeen genetic testing studies of complex disease, including 1,171 participants and reporting 195 effects, 104 of which were unadjusted for covariates, were meta-analyzed under a random effects model. Diseases included Alzheimer's, cardiovascular and coronary heart disease, lung cancer, melanoma, thrombophilia, and type II diabetes. Six domains of behavioral-psychological reactions were examined. Results: Carriers showed significantly increased self-reported behavior change compared to noncarriers when assessed 6 months or later after results return (Hedges's g = .36, p = .019). Conclusions: Return of genetic testing results for complex disease does not strongly impact self-reported negative behavior or psychological function of at-risk individuals. Return of results does appear to moderately increase self-reported healthy behavior in carriers, although research on objectively observed behavior change is needed. This is a growing area of research, with preliminary results suggesting potential positive implications of genetic testing for complex disease on behavior change.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1134-1144
Number of pages11
JournalHealth Psychology
Volume37
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Genetic Testing
Psychology
Thrombophilia
Research
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Coronary Disease
Melanoma
Lung Neoplasms
Alzheimer Disease

Keywords

  • Complex disease
  • Genetic essentialism
  • Genetic testing
  • Meta-analysis
  • Return of results

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review

Cite this

Behavioral Impact of Return of Genetic Test Results for Complex Disease : Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. / Frieser, Maia J.; Wilson, Sylia; Vrieze, Scott I.

In: Health Psychology, Vol. 37, No. 12, 01.12.2018, p. 1134-1144.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{377fdf5647c649b199b7860209c842ac,
title = "Behavioral Impact of Return of Genetic Test Results for Complex Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis",
abstract = "Objective: Advances in genomewide association studies have made possible the return of genetic risk results for complex diseases. Two concerns about these results are (a) negative psychological consequences and (b) viewing probabilistic results as deterministic, leading to misinterpretation and inappropriate decisions. The present study evaluates these concerns through a meta-analytic review of existing literature. Method: Seventeen genetic testing studies of complex disease, including 1,171 participants and reporting 195 effects, 104 of which were unadjusted for covariates, were meta-analyzed under a random effects model. Diseases included Alzheimer's, cardiovascular and coronary heart disease, lung cancer, melanoma, thrombophilia, and type II diabetes. Six domains of behavioral-psychological reactions were examined. Results: Carriers showed significantly increased self-reported behavior change compared to noncarriers when assessed 6 months or later after results return (Hedges's g = .36, p = .019). Conclusions: Return of genetic testing results for complex disease does not strongly impact self-reported negative behavior or psychological function of at-risk individuals. Return of results does appear to moderately increase self-reported healthy behavior in carriers, although research on objectively observed behavior change is needed. This is a growing area of research, with preliminary results suggesting potential positive implications of genetic testing for complex disease on behavior change.",
keywords = "Complex disease, Genetic essentialism, Genetic testing, Meta-analysis, Return of results",
author = "Frieser, {Maia J.} and Sylia Wilson and Vrieze, {Scott I}",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/hea0000683",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "1134--1144",
journal = "Health Psychology",
issn = "0278-6133",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Behavioral Impact of Return of Genetic Test Results for Complex Disease

T2 - Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

AU - Frieser, Maia J.

AU - Wilson, Sylia

AU - Vrieze, Scott I

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Objective: Advances in genomewide association studies have made possible the return of genetic risk results for complex diseases. Two concerns about these results are (a) negative psychological consequences and (b) viewing probabilistic results as deterministic, leading to misinterpretation and inappropriate decisions. The present study evaluates these concerns through a meta-analytic review of existing literature. Method: Seventeen genetic testing studies of complex disease, including 1,171 participants and reporting 195 effects, 104 of which were unadjusted for covariates, were meta-analyzed under a random effects model. Diseases included Alzheimer's, cardiovascular and coronary heart disease, lung cancer, melanoma, thrombophilia, and type II diabetes. Six domains of behavioral-psychological reactions were examined. Results: Carriers showed significantly increased self-reported behavior change compared to noncarriers when assessed 6 months or later after results return (Hedges's g = .36, p = .019). Conclusions: Return of genetic testing results for complex disease does not strongly impact self-reported negative behavior or psychological function of at-risk individuals. Return of results does appear to moderately increase self-reported healthy behavior in carriers, although research on objectively observed behavior change is needed. This is a growing area of research, with preliminary results suggesting potential positive implications of genetic testing for complex disease on behavior change.

AB - Objective: Advances in genomewide association studies have made possible the return of genetic risk results for complex diseases. Two concerns about these results are (a) negative psychological consequences and (b) viewing probabilistic results as deterministic, leading to misinterpretation and inappropriate decisions. The present study evaluates these concerns through a meta-analytic review of existing literature. Method: Seventeen genetic testing studies of complex disease, including 1,171 participants and reporting 195 effects, 104 of which were unadjusted for covariates, were meta-analyzed under a random effects model. Diseases included Alzheimer's, cardiovascular and coronary heart disease, lung cancer, melanoma, thrombophilia, and type II diabetes. Six domains of behavioral-psychological reactions were examined. Results: Carriers showed significantly increased self-reported behavior change compared to noncarriers when assessed 6 months or later after results return (Hedges's g = .36, p = .019). Conclusions: Return of genetic testing results for complex disease does not strongly impact self-reported negative behavior or psychological function of at-risk individuals. Return of results does appear to moderately increase self-reported healthy behavior in carriers, although research on objectively observed behavior change is needed. This is a growing area of research, with preliminary results suggesting potential positive implications of genetic testing for complex disease on behavior change.

KW - Complex disease

KW - Genetic essentialism

KW - Genetic testing

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Return of results

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054580717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054580717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/hea0000683

DO - 10.1037/hea0000683

M3 - Review article

C2 - 30307272

AN - SCOPUS:85054580717

VL - 37

SP - 1134

EP - 1144

JO - Health Psychology

JF - Health Psychology

SN - 0278-6133

IS - 12

ER -