Behavioral impact of graduated driver licensing on teenage driving risk and exposure

Pinar Karaca-Mandic, Greg Ridgeway

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Graduated driver licensing (GDL) is a critical policy tool for potentially improving teenage driving while reducing teen accident exposure. While previous studies demonstrated that GDL reduces teenage involvement in fatal crashes, much remains unanswered. We explore the mechanisms through which GDL influences accident rates as well as its long term effectiveness on teen driving. In particular, we investigate: (1) whether GDL policies improve teenage driving behavior, or simply reduce teenage prevalence on the roads; (2) whether GDL exposed teens become better drivers in later years. We employ a unique data source, the State Data System, which contains all police reported accidents (fatal and non-fatal) during 1990-2005 for 12 states. We estimate a structural model that separately identifies GDL's effect on relative teenage prevalence and relative teenage riskiness. Identification of the model is driven by the relative numbers of crashes between two teenagers, two adults, or a teenager and an adult. We find that the GDL policies reduce the number of 15-17-year-old accidents by limiting the amount of teenage driving rather than by improving teenage driving. This prevalence reduction primarily occurs at night and stricter GDL policies, especially those with night-time driving restrictions, are the most effective. Finally, we find that teen driving quality does not improve ex post GDL exposure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)48-61
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Health Economics
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Fingerprint

Licensure
Accidents
Information Storage and Retrieval
Structural Models
Police
Information Systems

Keywords

  • Graduated driver licensing
  • Teen driving exposure
  • Teen driving risk

Cite this

Behavioral impact of graduated driver licensing on teenage driving risk and exposure. / Karaca-Mandic, Pinar; Ridgeway, Greg.

In: Journal of Health Economics, Vol. 29, No. 1, 01.01.2010, p. 48-61.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e8882f47d68847e082f66a98335d0648,
title = "Behavioral impact of graduated driver licensing on teenage driving risk and exposure",
abstract = "Graduated driver licensing (GDL) is a critical policy tool for potentially improving teenage driving while reducing teen accident exposure. While previous studies demonstrated that GDL reduces teenage involvement in fatal crashes, much remains unanswered. We explore the mechanisms through which GDL influences accident rates as well as its long term effectiveness on teen driving. In particular, we investigate: (1) whether GDL policies improve teenage driving behavior, or simply reduce teenage prevalence on the roads; (2) whether GDL exposed teens become better drivers in later years. We employ a unique data source, the State Data System, which contains all police reported accidents (fatal and non-fatal) during 1990-2005 for 12 states. We estimate a structural model that separately identifies GDL's effect on relative teenage prevalence and relative teenage riskiness. Identification of the model is driven by the relative numbers of crashes between two teenagers, two adults, or a teenager and an adult. We find that the GDL policies reduce the number of 15-17-year-old accidents by limiting the amount of teenage driving rather than by improving teenage driving. This prevalence reduction primarily occurs at night and stricter GDL policies, especially those with night-time driving restrictions, are the most effective. Finally, we find that teen driving quality does not improve ex post GDL exposure.",
keywords = "Graduated driver licensing, Teen driving exposure, Teen driving risk",
author = "Pinar Karaca-Mandic and Greg Ridgeway",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.10.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "48--61",
journal = "Journal of Health Economics",
issn = "0167-6296",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Behavioral impact of graduated driver licensing on teenage driving risk and exposure

AU - Karaca-Mandic, Pinar

AU - Ridgeway, Greg

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Graduated driver licensing (GDL) is a critical policy tool for potentially improving teenage driving while reducing teen accident exposure. While previous studies demonstrated that GDL reduces teenage involvement in fatal crashes, much remains unanswered. We explore the mechanisms through which GDL influences accident rates as well as its long term effectiveness on teen driving. In particular, we investigate: (1) whether GDL policies improve teenage driving behavior, or simply reduce teenage prevalence on the roads; (2) whether GDL exposed teens become better drivers in later years. We employ a unique data source, the State Data System, which contains all police reported accidents (fatal and non-fatal) during 1990-2005 for 12 states. We estimate a structural model that separately identifies GDL's effect on relative teenage prevalence and relative teenage riskiness. Identification of the model is driven by the relative numbers of crashes between two teenagers, two adults, or a teenager and an adult. We find that the GDL policies reduce the number of 15-17-year-old accidents by limiting the amount of teenage driving rather than by improving teenage driving. This prevalence reduction primarily occurs at night and stricter GDL policies, especially those with night-time driving restrictions, are the most effective. Finally, we find that teen driving quality does not improve ex post GDL exposure.

AB - Graduated driver licensing (GDL) is a critical policy tool for potentially improving teenage driving while reducing teen accident exposure. While previous studies demonstrated that GDL reduces teenage involvement in fatal crashes, much remains unanswered. We explore the mechanisms through which GDL influences accident rates as well as its long term effectiveness on teen driving. In particular, we investigate: (1) whether GDL policies improve teenage driving behavior, or simply reduce teenage prevalence on the roads; (2) whether GDL exposed teens become better drivers in later years. We employ a unique data source, the State Data System, which contains all police reported accidents (fatal and non-fatal) during 1990-2005 for 12 states. We estimate a structural model that separately identifies GDL's effect on relative teenage prevalence and relative teenage riskiness. Identification of the model is driven by the relative numbers of crashes between two teenagers, two adults, or a teenager and an adult. We find that the GDL policies reduce the number of 15-17-year-old accidents by limiting the amount of teenage driving rather than by improving teenage driving. This prevalence reduction primarily occurs at night and stricter GDL policies, especially those with night-time driving restrictions, are the most effective. Finally, we find that teen driving quality does not improve ex post GDL exposure.

KW - Graduated driver licensing

KW - Teen driving exposure

KW - Teen driving risk

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77049097863&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77049097863&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.10.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.10.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 19942310

AN - SCOPUS:77049097863

VL - 29

SP - 48

EP - 61

JO - Journal of Health Economics

JF - Journal of Health Economics

SN - 0167-6296

IS - 1

ER -