Awareness of and reactions to mammography controversy among immigrant women

Rebekah H Nagler, Jennifer A. Lueck, Lauren S. Gray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There is substantial expert disagreement about the use of mammography to screen for breast cancer, and this disagreement routinely plays out in the media. Evidence suggests that some women are aware of the controversy over mammography, but less is known about whether immigrant and other underserved women have heard about it and, if so, how they react to it. Objective: To explore immigrant women's awareness of and reactions to mammography controversy. Design: Community-engaged qualitative study: we conducted six focus groups with 53 women aged 35–55 from three immigrant communities (Somali, Latina and Hmong) in a major US metropolitan area. A grounded theory approach was used to identify themes; NVivo 10 was used to enhance analyses. Results: Several themes emerged: (i) low awareness of mammography controversy across groups, despite self-reported attention to health information; (ii) high intentions to be screened, even after being told about the controversy; (iii) few reported discussions of mammography's risks and benefits with clinicians; (iv) substantial interest in learning more about mammography and breast cancer, but some low self-efficacy to obtain such information; and (v) questions about whether health recommendations matter and what qualifies as evidence. Conclusion: Given on-going expert disagreement about mammography screening, it is important for clinicians to help women understand mammography's risks and benefits so they can make an informed choice. This is particularly critical for immigrant and other underserved women, who may be less able to access, attend to, process, retain and act on health information (a phenomenon known as communication inequality).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)638-647
Number of pages10
JournalHealth Expectations
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2017

Fingerprint

Mammography
Health
Breast Neoplasms
Self Efficacy
Focus Groups
Hispanic Americans
Communication
Learning

Keywords

  • awareness
  • community-engaged research
  • controversy
  • immigrant women
  • mammography

Cite this

Awareness of and reactions to mammography controversy among immigrant women. / Nagler, Rebekah H; Lueck, Jennifer A.; Gray, Lauren S.

In: Health Expectations, Vol. 20, No. 4, 01.08.2017, p. 638-647.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nagler, Rebekah H ; Lueck, Jennifer A. ; Gray, Lauren S. / Awareness of and reactions to mammography controversy among immigrant women. In: Health Expectations. 2017 ; Vol. 20, No. 4. pp. 638-647.
@article{d3cc675f12ed498f81ef0760d731c5a6,
title = "Awareness of and reactions to mammography controversy among immigrant women",
abstract = "Background: There is substantial expert disagreement about the use of mammography to screen for breast cancer, and this disagreement routinely plays out in the media. Evidence suggests that some women are aware of the controversy over mammography, but less is known about whether immigrant and other underserved women have heard about it and, if so, how they react to it. Objective: To explore immigrant women's awareness of and reactions to mammography controversy. Design: Community-engaged qualitative study: we conducted six focus groups with 53 women aged 35–55 from three immigrant communities (Somali, Latina and Hmong) in a major US metropolitan area. A grounded theory approach was used to identify themes; NVivo 10 was used to enhance analyses. Results: Several themes emerged: (i) low awareness of mammography controversy across groups, despite self-reported attention to health information; (ii) high intentions to be screened, even after being told about the controversy; (iii) few reported discussions of mammography's risks and benefits with clinicians; (iv) substantial interest in learning more about mammography and breast cancer, but some low self-efficacy to obtain such information; and (v) questions about whether health recommendations matter and what qualifies as evidence. Conclusion: Given on-going expert disagreement about mammography screening, it is important for clinicians to help women understand mammography's risks and benefits so they can make an informed choice. This is particularly critical for immigrant and other underserved women, who may be less able to access, attend to, process, retain and act on health information (a phenomenon known as communication inequality).",
keywords = "awareness, community-engaged research, controversy, immigrant women, mammography",
author = "Nagler, {Rebekah H} and Lueck, {Jennifer A.} and Gray, {Lauren S.}",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/hex.12494",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "638--647",
journal = "Health Expectations",
issn = "1369-6513",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Awareness of and reactions to mammography controversy among immigrant women

AU - Nagler, Rebekah H

AU - Lueck, Jennifer A.

AU - Gray, Lauren S.

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - Background: There is substantial expert disagreement about the use of mammography to screen for breast cancer, and this disagreement routinely plays out in the media. Evidence suggests that some women are aware of the controversy over mammography, but less is known about whether immigrant and other underserved women have heard about it and, if so, how they react to it. Objective: To explore immigrant women's awareness of and reactions to mammography controversy. Design: Community-engaged qualitative study: we conducted six focus groups with 53 women aged 35–55 from three immigrant communities (Somali, Latina and Hmong) in a major US metropolitan area. A grounded theory approach was used to identify themes; NVivo 10 was used to enhance analyses. Results: Several themes emerged: (i) low awareness of mammography controversy across groups, despite self-reported attention to health information; (ii) high intentions to be screened, even after being told about the controversy; (iii) few reported discussions of mammography's risks and benefits with clinicians; (iv) substantial interest in learning more about mammography and breast cancer, but some low self-efficacy to obtain such information; and (v) questions about whether health recommendations matter and what qualifies as evidence. Conclusion: Given on-going expert disagreement about mammography screening, it is important for clinicians to help women understand mammography's risks and benefits so they can make an informed choice. This is particularly critical for immigrant and other underserved women, who may be less able to access, attend to, process, retain and act on health information (a phenomenon known as communication inequality).

AB - Background: There is substantial expert disagreement about the use of mammography to screen for breast cancer, and this disagreement routinely plays out in the media. Evidence suggests that some women are aware of the controversy over mammography, but less is known about whether immigrant and other underserved women have heard about it and, if so, how they react to it. Objective: To explore immigrant women's awareness of and reactions to mammography controversy. Design: Community-engaged qualitative study: we conducted six focus groups with 53 women aged 35–55 from three immigrant communities (Somali, Latina and Hmong) in a major US metropolitan area. A grounded theory approach was used to identify themes; NVivo 10 was used to enhance analyses. Results: Several themes emerged: (i) low awareness of mammography controversy across groups, despite self-reported attention to health information; (ii) high intentions to be screened, even after being told about the controversy; (iii) few reported discussions of mammography's risks and benefits with clinicians; (iv) substantial interest in learning more about mammography and breast cancer, but some low self-efficacy to obtain such information; and (v) questions about whether health recommendations matter and what qualifies as evidence. Conclusion: Given on-going expert disagreement about mammography screening, it is important for clinicians to help women understand mammography's risks and benefits so they can make an informed choice. This is particularly critical for immigrant and other underserved women, who may be less able to access, attend to, process, retain and act on health information (a phenomenon known as communication inequality).

KW - awareness

KW - community-engaged research

KW - controversy

KW - immigrant women

KW - mammography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992079903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992079903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/hex.12494

DO - 10.1111/hex.12494

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 638

EP - 647

JO - Health Expectations

JF - Health Expectations

SN - 1369-6513

IS - 4

ER -