Autonomy and control in children's interactions with imaginary companions

Marjorie Taylor, Stephanie M Carlson, Alison B. Shawber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although many children describe their imaginary companions as primarily friendly and compliant, imaginary companions can also be experienced as unfriendly, mean, bossy, aggressive, and/or frightening. Such negative accounts of imaginary companions suggest that children do not always experience their imaginary companions as completely under control. In this chapter we report a study investigating the extent of negative characteristics in children's descriptions of imaginary companions. The participants were 89 preschool children who described their imaginary companions (46 invisible friends and 43 personified objects). The descriptions were coded for disobedient or otherwise difficult behaviour attributed to the imaginary companions. Thirty-six per cent of the children described their imaginary companions as consistently compliant and agreeable, 35 per cent gave some indication that the imaginary companions did not always do or say what the children wanted, although they were mostly friendly and compliant, and 29 per cent described their imaginary companions as noncompliant in ways that suggested the children experienced the companion to some extent as being out of their conscious control. Three reasons for some children's experience of lack of control over their imaginary companions were discussed: noncompliance as an emotive, illusion of independent agency, and individual differences in inhibitory control. Noncompliant and/or troublesome imaginary companions occur frequently enough to be considered normative, and provide insight into what is on children's minds as well as how children process information that is generated in imagination versus what is perceptually experienced.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)81-100
Number of pages20
JournalProceedings of the British Academy
Volume147
StatePublished - Dec 1 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

autonomy
interaction
Companionship
Interaction
Autonomy
information process
preschool child
indication
experience
lack

Cite this

Autonomy and control in children's interactions with imaginary companions. / Taylor, Marjorie; Carlson, Stephanie M; Shawber, Alison B.

In: Proceedings of the British Academy, Vol. 147, 01.12.2007, p. 81-100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{94f9ecc4c02b4e78af902ecc325557f2,
title = "Autonomy and control in children's interactions with imaginary companions",
abstract = "Although many children describe their imaginary companions as primarily friendly and compliant, imaginary companions can also be experienced as unfriendly, mean, bossy, aggressive, and/or frightening. Such negative accounts of imaginary companions suggest that children do not always experience their imaginary companions as completely under control. In this chapter we report a study investigating the extent of negative characteristics in children's descriptions of imaginary companions. The participants were 89 preschool children who described their imaginary companions (46 invisible friends and 43 personified objects). The descriptions were coded for disobedient or otherwise difficult behaviour attributed to the imaginary companions. Thirty-six per cent of the children described their imaginary companions as consistently compliant and agreeable, 35 per cent gave some indication that the imaginary companions did not always do or say what the children wanted, although they were mostly friendly and compliant, and 29 per cent described their imaginary companions as noncompliant in ways that suggested the children experienced the companion to some extent as being out of their conscious control. Three reasons for some children's experience of lack of control over their imaginary companions were discussed: noncompliance as an emotive, illusion of independent agency, and individual differences in inhibitory control. Noncompliant and/or troublesome imaginary companions occur frequently enough to be considered normative, and provide insight into what is on children's minds as well as how children process information that is generated in imagination versus what is perceptually experienced.",
author = "Marjorie Taylor and Carlson, {Stephanie M} and Shawber, {Alison B.}",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "147",
pages = "81--100",
journal = "Proceedings of the British Academy",
issn = "0068-1202",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Autonomy and control in children's interactions with imaginary companions

AU - Taylor, Marjorie

AU - Carlson, Stephanie M

AU - Shawber, Alison B.

PY - 2007/12/1

Y1 - 2007/12/1

N2 - Although many children describe their imaginary companions as primarily friendly and compliant, imaginary companions can also be experienced as unfriendly, mean, bossy, aggressive, and/or frightening. Such negative accounts of imaginary companions suggest that children do not always experience their imaginary companions as completely under control. In this chapter we report a study investigating the extent of negative characteristics in children's descriptions of imaginary companions. The participants were 89 preschool children who described their imaginary companions (46 invisible friends and 43 personified objects). The descriptions were coded for disobedient or otherwise difficult behaviour attributed to the imaginary companions. Thirty-six per cent of the children described their imaginary companions as consistently compliant and agreeable, 35 per cent gave some indication that the imaginary companions did not always do or say what the children wanted, although they were mostly friendly and compliant, and 29 per cent described their imaginary companions as noncompliant in ways that suggested the children experienced the companion to some extent as being out of their conscious control. Three reasons for some children's experience of lack of control over their imaginary companions were discussed: noncompliance as an emotive, illusion of independent agency, and individual differences in inhibitory control. Noncompliant and/or troublesome imaginary companions occur frequently enough to be considered normative, and provide insight into what is on children's minds as well as how children process information that is generated in imagination versus what is perceptually experienced.

AB - Although many children describe their imaginary companions as primarily friendly and compliant, imaginary companions can also be experienced as unfriendly, mean, bossy, aggressive, and/or frightening. Such negative accounts of imaginary companions suggest that children do not always experience their imaginary companions as completely under control. In this chapter we report a study investigating the extent of negative characteristics in children's descriptions of imaginary companions. The participants were 89 preschool children who described their imaginary companions (46 invisible friends and 43 personified objects). The descriptions were coded for disobedient or otherwise difficult behaviour attributed to the imaginary companions. Thirty-six per cent of the children described their imaginary companions as consistently compliant and agreeable, 35 per cent gave some indication that the imaginary companions did not always do or say what the children wanted, although they were mostly friendly and compliant, and 29 per cent described their imaginary companions as noncompliant in ways that suggested the children experienced the companion to some extent as being out of their conscious control. Three reasons for some children's experience of lack of control over their imaginary companions were discussed: noncompliance as an emotive, illusion of independent agency, and individual differences in inhibitory control. Noncompliant and/or troublesome imaginary companions occur frequently enough to be considered normative, and provide insight into what is on children's minds as well as how children process information that is generated in imagination versus what is perceptually experienced.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61549085587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=61549085587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 147

SP - 81

EP - 100

JO - Proceedings of the British Academy

JF - Proceedings of the British Academy

SN - 0068-1202

ER -