TY - GEN
T1 - Automatically building research reading lists
AU - Ekstrand, Michael D.
AU - Kannan, Praveen
AU - Stemper, James A
AU - Butler, John T.
AU - Konstan, Joseph A.
AU - Riedl, John T.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - All new researchers face the daunting task of familiarizing themselves with the existing body of research literature in their respective fields. Recommender algorithms could aid in preparing these lists, but most current algorithms do not understand how to rate the importance of a paper within the literature, which might limit their effectiveness in this domain. We explore several methods for augmenting exist-ing collaborative and content-based filtering algorithms with measures of the inuence of a paper within the web of cita-tions. We measure inuence using well-known algorithms, such as HITS and PageRank, for measuring a node's im-portance in a graph. Among these augmentation methods is a novel method for using importance scores to inuence collaborative filtering. We present a task-centered evalua-tion, including both an ofiine analysis and a user study, of the performance of the algorithms. Results from these stud-ies indicate that collaborative filtering outperforms content-based approaches for generating introductory reading lists.
AB - All new researchers face the daunting task of familiarizing themselves with the existing body of research literature in their respective fields. Recommender algorithms could aid in preparing these lists, but most current algorithms do not understand how to rate the importance of a paper within the literature, which might limit their effectiveness in this domain. We explore several methods for augmenting exist-ing collaborative and content-based filtering algorithms with measures of the inuence of a paper within the web of cita-tions. We measure inuence using well-known algorithms, such as HITS and PageRank, for measuring a node's im-portance in a graph. Among these augmentation methods is a novel method for using importance scores to inuence collaborative filtering. We present a task-centered evalua-tion, including both an ofiine analysis and a user study, of the performance of the algorithms. Results from these stud-ies indicate that collaborative filtering outperforms content-based approaches for generating introductory reading lists.
KW - Citation web
KW - Collaborative filtering
KW - Digital libraries
KW - Recom-mender systems
KW - User study
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649953561&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649953561&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/1864708.1864740
DO - 10.1145/1864708.1864740
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:78649953561
SN - 9781450304429
T3 - RecSys'10 - Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
SP - 159
EP - 166
BT - RecSys'10 - Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
T2 - 4th ACM Recommender Systems Conference, RecSys 2010
Y2 - 26 September 2010 through 30 September 2010
ER -