Authors' Reply

Aniruddha Pant; Pete Seiler; Karl Hedrick

doi:10.1109/TAC.2004.828328

Authors' Reply

Aniruddha Pant, Pete Seiler, Karl Hedrick

Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Abstract

In this note, we respond to the comments submitted by Zhang. In our opinion, we have responded to his objections in the explanation that follows. Zhang's counterexample did focus our attention on a modification needed to the definition and the proof of mesh stability. We believe that these modifications have made the exposition of material more lucid.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	859-861
Number of pages	3
Journal	IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
Volume	49
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2004.828328
State	Published - May 2004

Keywords

Interconnected systems
mesh stability

Publisher link

10.1109/TAC.2004.828328

Find It

Find It at U of M Libraries

Cite this

@article{59d97a1a960c4f4fb52cf06961d1513a,

title = "Authors' Reply",

abstract = "In this note, we respond to the comments submitted by Zhang. In our opinion, we have responded to his objections in the explanation that follows. Zhang's counterexample did focus our attention on a modification needed to the definition and the proof of mesh stability. We believe that these modifications have made the exposition of material more lucid.",

keywords = "Interconnected systems, mesh stability",

author = "Aniruddha Pant and Pete Seiler and Karl Hedrick",

year = "2004",

month = may,

doi = "10.1109/TAC.2004.828328",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "49",

pages = "859--861",

journal = "IRE Transactions on Automatic Control",

issn = "0018-9286",

publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Authors' Reply

AU - Pant, Aniruddha

AU - Seiler, Pete

AU - Hedrick, Karl

PY - 2004/5

Y1 - 2004/5

N2 - In this note, we respond to the comments submitted by Zhang. In our opinion, we have responded to his objections in the explanation that follows. Zhang's counterexample did focus our attention on a modification needed to the definition and the proof of mesh stability. We believe that these modifications have made the exposition of material more lucid.

AB - In this note, we respond to the comments submitted by Zhang. In our opinion, we have responded to his objections in the explanation that follows. Zhang's counterexample did focus our attention on a modification needed to the definition and the proof of mesh stability. We believe that these modifications have made the exposition of material more lucid.

KW - Interconnected systems

KW - mesh stability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008027072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85008027072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/TAC.2004.828328

DO - 10.1109/TAC.2004.828328

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85008027072

SN - 0018-9286

VL - 49

SP - 859

EP - 861

JO - IRE Transactions on Automatic Control

JF - IRE Transactions on Automatic Control

IS - 5

ER -

Authors' Reply

Abstract

Keywords

Publisher link

Find It

Other files and links

Cite this