Abstract
In the version of this article initially published, the first entry in Table 2 referred to the carrier density of Imax, which has since been deleted. The Fig. 3a caption, third sentence, contained “not at the same ns,” which has been removed, and the Fig. 3b caption starting “Benchmarking Isat versus n” has been altered to read “versus ns.” Additionally, the Supplementary information has been updated after the phrase “carrier densities at which Imin is extracted” was removed from Note S1 and the Fig. S1 caption. The clarifications have been made in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 620 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Nature Electronics |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Sep 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2022, Springer Nature Limited.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Author Correction: How to report and benchmark emerging field-effect transistors (Nature Electronics, (2022), 5, 7, (416-423), 10.1038/s41928-022-00798-8)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS