Auditory stream segregation and selective attention for cochlear implant listeners: Evidence from behavioral measures and event-related potentials

Andreu Paredes-Gallardo, Hamish Innes-Brown, Sara M.K. Madsen, Torsten Dau, Jeremy Marozeau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations


The role of the spatial separation between the stimulating electrodes (electrode separation) in sequential stream segregation was explored in cochlear implant (CI) listeners using a deviant detection task. Twelve CI listeners were instructed to attend to a series of target sounds in the presence of interleaved distractor sounds. A deviant was randomly introduced in the target stream either at the beginning, middle or end of each trial. The listeners were asked to detect sequences that contained a deviant and to report its location within the trial. The perceptual segregation of the streams should, therefore, improve deviant detection performance. The electrode range for the distractor sounds was varied, resulting in different amounts of overlap between the target and the distractor streams. For the largest electrode separation condition, event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded under active and passive listening conditions. The listeners were asked to perform the behavioral task for the active listening condition and encouraged to watch a muted movie for the passive listening condition. Deviant detection performance improved with increasing electrode separation between the streams, suggesting that larger electrode differences facilitate the segregation of the streams. Deviant detection performance was best for deviants happening late in the sequence, indicating that a segregated percept builds up over time. The analysis of the ERP waveforms revealed that auditory selective attention modulates the ERP responses in CI listeners. Specifically, the responses to the target stream were, overall, larger in the active relative to the passive listening condition. Conversely, the ERP responses to the distractor stream were not affected by selective attention. However, no significant correlation was observed between the behavioral performance and the amount of attentional modulation. Overall, the findings from the present study suggest that CI listeners can use electrode separation to perceptually group sequential sounds. Moreover, selective attention can be deployed on the resulting auditory objects, as reflected by the attentional modulation of the ERPs at the group level.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number581
JournalFrontiers in Neuroscience
Issue numberAUG
StatePublished - Aug 21 2018

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We would like to thank all volunteers who participated in this study. We thank the two reviewers and the editor for the helpful and constructive comments on an earlier version of the article. We thank Colette McKay for her help, advice, and constructive criticism during the design of the experiments; Darren Mao for his help with the EEG setup; and our colleagues from the Hearing Systems Group and the Translational Hearing Group for valuable comments and stimulating discussions. We also thank Cochlear Ltd. for providing us with some of the research equipment for this study This work was supported by the Oticon Centre of Excellence for Hearing and Speech Sciences (CHESS), the Carlsberg Foundation, the National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia) Early-Career Research Fellowship Grant No. 1069999, and The Marian and E.H. Flack Trust. The Bionics Institute acknowledges the support from the Victorian Government through its Operational Infrastructure Support Program.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Paredes-Gallardo, Innes-Brown, Madsen, Dau and Marozeau.


  • Auditory attention
  • Auditory scene analysis
  • Build-up
  • Cochlear implant
  • Event-related potentials
  • Segregation


Dive into the research topics of 'Auditory stream segregation and selective attention for cochlear implant listeners: Evidence from behavioral measures and event-related potentials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this