Attitudes Toward Return of Genetic Research Results to Relatives, Including After Death: Comparison of Cancer Probands, Blood Relatives, and Spouse/Partners

Carmen Radecki Breitkopf, Susan M. Wolf, Kari G. Chaffee, Marguerite E. Robinson, Noralane M. Lindor, Deborah R. Gordon, Barbara A. Koenig, Gloria M. Petersen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Genetic research generates results with implications for relatives. Recommendations addressing relatives’ access to a participant’s genetic research findings include eliciting participant preferences about access and choosing a representative to make decisions about access upon participant incapacity/death. Representatives are likely to be blood relatives or spouse/partners (who may share genetically related children). This raises the question of whether relatives hold similar attitudes about access or divergent attitudes that may yield conflict. We surveyed pancreatic cancer biobank participants (probands) and relatives in a family registry (blood relatives and spouse/partners of probands); 1,903 (>55%) surveys were returned. Results revealed few attitudinal differences between the groups. A slightly higher proportion of blood relatives agreed with statements reflecting proband privacy. In conclusion, probands’ decisions on access are likely to be accepted by relatives; in choosing a representative, probands may not face major differences in attitudes about privacy/sharing between a blood relative and a spouse/partner.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)295-304
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Keywords

  • attitudes
  • biological family
  • cancer biobank
  • genetic research
  • pancreatic cancer
  • return of results

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Attitudes Toward Return of Genetic Research Results to Relatives, Including After Death: Comparison of Cancer Probands, Blood Relatives, and Spouse/Partners'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this