Attitudes of Great Plains producers about best management practices, conservation programs, and water quality

Craig M. Smith, Jeffrey M Peterson, John C. Leatherman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Over the past few decades many millions of dollars have been spent on the promotion, installation, and maintenance of cropland best management practices (BMPs) that reduce nutrient and sediment runoff. Compensating producers through conservation programs for BMP adoption has had notable success to date; however, there are still many producers who choose not to participate in conservation programs and/or decide not to implement BMPs. Why is this the case and how can we as conservationists better promote and encourage BMP adoption and conservation program participation? We found that a high percentage of producers are aware of available conservation programs; however, less than half of those indicate that they have participated in the programs. Our survey results suggest there is no single, simple answer to speeding the rate of producers' BMP adoption and participation in conservation programs. We advocate that participation rates can be raised substantially through a multifaceted approach that may include increased payment levels but also acknowledges the gap in perceptions, provides more flexible enrollment options, and simplifies enrollment procedures and rules while continuing to ensure compliance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Soil and Water Conservation
Volume62
Issue number5
StatePublished - Sep 1 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

best management practices
conservation programs
best management practice
water quality
compliance
runoff
programme
plain
sediments
nutrients
nutrient
sediment
participation

Cite this

Attitudes of Great Plains producers about best management practices, conservation programs, and water quality. / Smith, Craig M.; Peterson, Jeffrey M; Leatherman, John C.

In: Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, Vol. 62, No. 5, 01.09.2007.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2f28ce0f6ef841f0876090c5c7e00ee6,
title = "Attitudes of Great Plains producers about best management practices, conservation programs, and water quality",
abstract = "Over the past few decades many millions of dollars have been spent on the promotion, installation, and maintenance of cropland best management practices (BMPs) that reduce nutrient and sediment runoff. Compensating producers through conservation programs for BMP adoption has had notable success to date; however, there are still many producers who choose not to participate in conservation programs and/or decide not to implement BMPs. Why is this the case and how can we as conservationists better promote and encourage BMP adoption and conservation program participation? We found that a high percentage of producers are aware of available conservation programs; however, less than half of those indicate that they have participated in the programs. Our survey results suggest there is no single, simple answer to speeding the rate of producers' BMP adoption and participation in conservation programs. We advocate that participation rates can be raised substantially through a multifaceted approach that may include increased payment levels but also acknowledges the gap in perceptions, provides more flexible enrollment options, and simplifies enrollment procedures and rules while continuing to ensure compliance.",
author = "Smith, {Craig M.} and Peterson, {Jeffrey M} and Leatherman, {John C.}",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "62",
journal = "Journal of Soils and Water Conservation",
issn = "0022-4561",
publisher = "Soil Conservation Society of America",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attitudes of Great Plains producers about best management practices, conservation programs, and water quality

AU - Smith, Craig M.

AU - Peterson, Jeffrey M

AU - Leatherman, John C.

PY - 2007/9/1

Y1 - 2007/9/1

N2 - Over the past few decades many millions of dollars have been spent on the promotion, installation, and maintenance of cropland best management practices (BMPs) that reduce nutrient and sediment runoff. Compensating producers through conservation programs for BMP adoption has had notable success to date; however, there are still many producers who choose not to participate in conservation programs and/or decide not to implement BMPs. Why is this the case and how can we as conservationists better promote and encourage BMP adoption and conservation program participation? We found that a high percentage of producers are aware of available conservation programs; however, less than half of those indicate that they have participated in the programs. Our survey results suggest there is no single, simple answer to speeding the rate of producers' BMP adoption and participation in conservation programs. We advocate that participation rates can be raised substantially through a multifaceted approach that may include increased payment levels but also acknowledges the gap in perceptions, provides more flexible enrollment options, and simplifies enrollment procedures and rules while continuing to ensure compliance.

AB - Over the past few decades many millions of dollars have been spent on the promotion, installation, and maintenance of cropland best management practices (BMPs) that reduce nutrient and sediment runoff. Compensating producers through conservation programs for BMP adoption has had notable success to date; however, there are still many producers who choose not to participate in conservation programs and/or decide not to implement BMPs. Why is this the case and how can we as conservationists better promote and encourage BMP adoption and conservation program participation? We found that a high percentage of producers are aware of available conservation programs; however, less than half of those indicate that they have participated in the programs. Our survey results suggest there is no single, simple answer to speeding the rate of producers' BMP adoption and participation in conservation programs. We advocate that participation rates can be raised substantially through a multifaceted approach that may include increased payment levels but also acknowledges the gap in perceptions, provides more flexible enrollment options, and simplifies enrollment procedures and rules while continuing to ensure compliance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34848885453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34848885453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34848885453

VL - 62

JO - Journal of Soils and Water Conservation

JF - Journal of Soils and Water Conservation

SN - 0022-4561

IS - 5

ER -