Atheists as "other": Moral boundaries and cultural membership in American society

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 286 Citations

Abstract

Despite the declining salience of divisions among religious groups, the boundary between believers and nonbelievers in America remains strong. This article examines the limits of Americans' acceptance of atheists. Using new national survey data, it shows atheists are less likely to be accepted, publicly and privately, than any others from a long list of ethnic, religious, and other minority groups. This distrust of atheists is driven by religious predictors, social location, and broader value orientations. It is rooted in moral and symbolic, rather than ethnic or material, grounds. We demonstrate that increasing acceptance of religious diversity does not extend to the nonreligious, and present a theoretical framework for understanding the role of religious belief in providing a moral basis for cultural membership and solidarity in an otherwise highly diverse society.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)211-234
Number of pages24
JournalAmerican Sociological Review
Volume71
Issue number2
StatePublished - Apr 2006

Fingerprint

acceptance
US citizen
measurement method
religious group
value-orientation
solidarity
minority
diversity
location
membership
material
society
survey
data

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{482f9a656d0d4f79b5ef49bedde55ec5,
title = "Atheists as {"}other{"}: Moral boundaries and cultural membership in American society",
abstract = "Despite the declining salience of divisions among religious groups, the boundary between believers and nonbelievers in America remains strong. This article examines the limits of Americans' acceptance of atheists. Using new national survey data, it shows atheists are less likely to be accepted, publicly and privately, than any others from a long list of ethnic, religious, and other minority groups. This distrust of atheists is driven by religious predictors, social location, and broader value orientations. It is rooted in moral and symbolic, rather than ethnic or material, grounds. We demonstrate that increasing acceptance of religious diversity does not extend to the nonreligious, and present a theoretical framework for understanding the role of religious belief in providing a moral basis for cultural membership and solidarity in an otherwise highly diverse society.",
author = "Penny Edgell and Joseph Gerteis and Douglas Hartmann",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
volume = "71",
pages = "211--234",
journal = "American Sociological Review",
issn = "0003-1224",
publisher = "American Sociological Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Atheists as "other"

T2 - American Sociological Review

AU - Edgell,Penny

AU - Gerteis,Joseph

AU - Hartmann,Douglas

PY - 2006/4

Y1 - 2006/4

N2 - Despite the declining salience of divisions among religious groups, the boundary between believers and nonbelievers in America remains strong. This article examines the limits of Americans' acceptance of atheists. Using new national survey data, it shows atheists are less likely to be accepted, publicly and privately, than any others from a long list of ethnic, religious, and other minority groups. This distrust of atheists is driven by religious predictors, social location, and broader value orientations. It is rooted in moral and symbolic, rather than ethnic or material, grounds. We demonstrate that increasing acceptance of religious diversity does not extend to the nonreligious, and present a theoretical framework for understanding the role of religious belief in providing a moral basis for cultural membership and solidarity in an otherwise highly diverse society.

AB - Despite the declining salience of divisions among religious groups, the boundary between believers and nonbelievers in America remains strong. This article examines the limits of Americans' acceptance of atheists. Using new national survey data, it shows atheists are less likely to be accepted, publicly and privately, than any others from a long list of ethnic, religious, and other minority groups. This distrust of atheists is driven by religious predictors, social location, and broader value orientations. It is rooted in moral and symbolic, rather than ethnic or material, grounds. We demonstrate that increasing acceptance of religious diversity does not extend to the nonreligious, and present a theoretical framework for understanding the role of religious belief in providing a moral basis for cultural membership and solidarity in an otherwise highly diverse society.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33744749598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33744749598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 71

SP - 211

EP - 234

JO - American Sociological Review

JF - American Sociological Review

SN - 0003-1224

IS - 2

ER -