Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Asymptomatic vs Symptomatic Hypotension With Sacubitril/Valsartan in Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction in PARADIGM-HF

  • Shingo Matsumoto
  • , Li Shen
  • , Alasdair D. Henderson
  • , Michael Böhm
  • , Akshay S. Desai
  • , Lars Køber
  • , Martin P. Lefkowitz
  • , Milton Packer
  • , Jean L. Rouleau
  • , Scott D. Solomon
  • , Karl Swedberg
  • , Muthiah Vaduganathan
  • , Orly Vardeny
  • , Adriaan A. Voors
  • , Michael R. Zile
  • , Pardeep S. Jhund
  • , John J.V. McMurray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Hypotension is an important clinical problem in heart failure (HF). Objectives: This study sought to examine the association between asymptomatic vs symptomatic hypotension and outcomes in PARADIGM-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure). Methods: In a post hoc analysis of PARADIGM-HF, the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan compared to enalapril were estimated using time-updated Cox proportional hazards models. The primary outcome was cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization. Results: Among 8,399 patients in PARADIGM-HF, 1,343 (16.0%) experienced only asymptomatic hypotension, and 936 (11.1%) experienced symptomatic hypotension at least once after randomization. Patients with symptomatic hypotension were older and more frequently had cardiovascular comorbidities compared to those developing only asymptomatic hypotension. By contrast, left ventricular ejection fraction was lower in those with asymptomatic hypotension. Patients who experienced either type of hypotension were at higher risk for all outcomes examined. However, the effect of sacubitril/valsartan on the primary outcome was not diminished in patients experiencing hypotension compared to those who did not: the HR for sacubitril/valsartan vs enalapril was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.72-0.89) for no hypotension, 0.87 (95% CI: 0.70-1.08) for asymptomatic hypotension, and 0.51 (95% CI: 0.38-0.69) for symptomatic hypotension (Pinteraction = 0.01), and this was also true for cardiovascular and all-cause deaths. The safety of sacubitril/valsartan vs enalapril was also maintained regardless of the occurrence of hypotension. Discontinuation of randomized treatment was less common with sacubitril/valsartan vs enalapril in patients experiencing asymptomatic and symptomatic hypotension. Conclusions: Although both asymptomatic and symptomatic hypotension during treatment with sacubitril/valsartan or enalapril were associated with worse outcomes, the benefits of sacubitril/valsartan were maintained (or even enhanced) in patients experiencing hypotension.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1685-1700
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume84
Issue number18
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 29 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • asymptomatic hypotension
  • heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)
  • hypotension
  • sacubitril/valsartan
  • symptomatic hypotension

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Asymptomatic vs Symptomatic Hypotension With Sacubitril/Valsartan in Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction in PARADIGM-HF'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this