Abstract
Significance: Determining if tobacco-related biomarkers of exposure (BOE) are associated with respiratory symptoms is an important public health tool that can be used to evaluate the potential harm of different tobacco products. Methods: Adult data from people who exclusively smoked cigarettes (N = 2,438) in Waves 1–4 (2013–2017) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study were stacked to examine associations between baseline and follow-up within wave pairs (W1-W2, W2-W3, W3-W4). Weighted generalized estimating equation models were used to evaluate associations between biomarkers of nicotine, tobacco-specific nitrosamines, acrolein, acrylonitrile, cadmium, and lead at baseline/follow-up and respiratory symptom(s) (wheezing/whistling in the chest, wheezing during exercise, and/or dry cough in the past 12 months) at follow-up. Results: Higher acrolein metabolite (CEMA) levels at follow-up were associated with increased odds of respiratory symptoms at follow-up for people who exclusively smoked cigarettes (aOR = 1.34; 95% CI = 1.06, 1.70), including when limited to those without a diagnosed respiratory disease (aOR = 1.46; 95% CI = 1.12, 1.90) and those who smoked daily (aOR = 1.40; 95% CI = 1.06, 1.84). Higher cadmium levels at baseline (while controlling for follow-up levels) were associated with reduced odds of respiratory symptoms at follow-up (aOR = 0.80; 95% CI = 0.65, 0.98) among people who exclusively smoked cigarettes without a respiratory disease. There were no significant associations between baseline/follow-up BOE and follow-up respiratory symptoms for people who smoked cigarettes non-daily. Conclusions: This research supports measuring biomarkers of acrolein, such as CEMA, as a potential intermediate measurement for increased respiratory symptom development. Measuring these biomarkers could help alleviate the clinical burden of respiratory disease.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Article number | 100487 |
Journal | Addictive Behaviors Reports |
Volume | 17 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This study is a cross-institution collaborative project from the Health Effects Special Interest Group supported, in part, by the Center for Coordination of Analytics, Science, Enhancement and Logistics (CASEL) in Tobacco Regulatory Science U54DA046060-01 (National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA) and the Food and Drug Administration’s Center for Tobacco Products (FDA CTP). Individual authors were supported, in part, as follows: JLH-National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) and FDA CTP (U54HL120163) and National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) (P42 ES023716); CRG- NCI (HHSN261201700004I). The content of this presentation/paper is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the co-authors’ institutions, the NIH, or the FDA.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)
Keywords
- Biomarkers
- Cigarette
- Nicotine
- Public health
PubMed: MeSH publication types
- Journal Article