Association between volume and charges for most frequently performed ambulatory and nonambulatory surgery for bladder cancer. Is more cheaper?

Badrinath R. Konety, Vibhu Dhawan, Veerasathpurush Allareddy, Michael A. O'Donnell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We investigated the relationship between provider volume and charges for transurethral bladder tumor resection (TURBT) and radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer. Materials and Methods: The National Inpatient Sample (1988 to 1999) of the Health Care Utilization Project, and State Ambulatory Surgery Databases for Wisconsin and Florida (2000 data set) were used for analysis. All patients with bladder cancer who had undergone radical cystectomy or TURBT as the principal procedure were identified. Hospitals and surgeons were categorized into terciles of volume based on the average number performed per year. The average hospital charge per discharge/procedure corrected to 2000 levels was calculated. One-way ANOVA with the Bonferroni correction was used to compare charges between different volume levels. Results: A total of 13,498 patients who underwent radical cystectomy and 5,954 who underwent TURBT were included in the analysis. Charges for radical cystectomy were $5,648 lower at high volume hospitals than at low volume hospitals (p <0.001). High volume surgeons were $2,976 less expensive than low volume surgeons (p = 0.054). For TURBT total hospital charges at high volume hospitals were $1,013 more than at low volume hospitals (p <0.0001), while average total hospital charges for procedures performed by high volume surgeons were $919 less compared to low volume surgeons (p <0.0001). Conclusions: High risk inpatient procedures for bladder cancer such as cystectomy, which are more influenced by systems of care, are less expensive to perform at high volume centers. Lower risk ambulatory procedures for bladder cancer, such as TURBT, which are not influenced by systems of care, may be more cost efficiently performed by high volume surgeons at low volume centers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1056-1061
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume172
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2004

Fingerprint

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
Cystectomy
Hospital Charges
Low-Volume Hospitals
High-Volume Hospitals
Inpatients
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Surgeons
Analysis of Variance
Databases
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Bladder
  • Bladder neoplasms
  • Fees and charges

Cite this

Association between volume and charges for most frequently performed ambulatory and nonambulatory surgery for bladder cancer. Is more cheaper? / Konety, Badrinath R.; Dhawan, Vibhu; Allareddy, Veerasathpurush; O'Donnell, Michael A.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 172, No. 3, 01.01.2004, p. 1056-1061.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b56b3ca7bd4c463ca873e3cf8a0a446c,
title = "Association between volume and charges for most frequently performed ambulatory and nonambulatory surgery for bladder cancer. Is more cheaper?",
abstract = "Purpose: We investigated the relationship between provider volume and charges for transurethral bladder tumor resection (TURBT) and radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer. Materials and Methods: The National Inpatient Sample (1988 to 1999) of the Health Care Utilization Project, and State Ambulatory Surgery Databases for Wisconsin and Florida (2000 data set) were used for analysis. All patients with bladder cancer who had undergone radical cystectomy or TURBT as the principal procedure were identified. Hospitals and surgeons were categorized into terciles of volume based on the average number performed per year. The average hospital charge per discharge/procedure corrected to 2000 levels was calculated. One-way ANOVA with the Bonferroni correction was used to compare charges between different volume levels. Results: A total of 13,498 patients who underwent radical cystectomy and 5,954 who underwent TURBT were included in the analysis. Charges for radical cystectomy were $5,648 lower at high volume hospitals than at low volume hospitals (p <0.001). High volume surgeons were $2,976 less expensive than low volume surgeons (p = 0.054). For TURBT total hospital charges at high volume hospitals were $1,013 more than at low volume hospitals (p <0.0001), while average total hospital charges for procedures performed by high volume surgeons were $919 less compared to low volume surgeons (p <0.0001). Conclusions: High risk inpatient procedures for bladder cancer such as cystectomy, which are more influenced by systems of care, are less expensive to perform at high volume centers. Lower risk ambulatory procedures for bladder cancer, such as TURBT, which are not influenced by systems of care, may be more cost efficiently performed by high volume surgeons at low volume centers.",
keywords = "Bladder, Bladder neoplasms, Fees and charges",
author = "Konety, {Badrinath R.} and Vibhu Dhawan and Veerasathpurush Allareddy and O'Donnell, {Michael A.}",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.ju.0000136382.51688.21",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "172",
pages = "1056--1061",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Association between volume and charges for most frequently performed ambulatory and nonambulatory surgery for bladder cancer. Is more cheaper?

AU - Konety, Badrinath R.

AU - Dhawan, Vibhu

AU - Allareddy, Veerasathpurush

AU - O'Donnell, Michael A.

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - Purpose: We investigated the relationship between provider volume and charges for transurethral bladder tumor resection (TURBT) and radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer. Materials and Methods: The National Inpatient Sample (1988 to 1999) of the Health Care Utilization Project, and State Ambulatory Surgery Databases for Wisconsin and Florida (2000 data set) were used for analysis. All patients with bladder cancer who had undergone radical cystectomy or TURBT as the principal procedure were identified. Hospitals and surgeons were categorized into terciles of volume based on the average number performed per year. The average hospital charge per discharge/procedure corrected to 2000 levels was calculated. One-way ANOVA with the Bonferroni correction was used to compare charges between different volume levels. Results: A total of 13,498 patients who underwent radical cystectomy and 5,954 who underwent TURBT were included in the analysis. Charges for radical cystectomy were $5,648 lower at high volume hospitals than at low volume hospitals (p <0.001). High volume surgeons were $2,976 less expensive than low volume surgeons (p = 0.054). For TURBT total hospital charges at high volume hospitals were $1,013 more than at low volume hospitals (p <0.0001), while average total hospital charges for procedures performed by high volume surgeons were $919 less compared to low volume surgeons (p <0.0001). Conclusions: High risk inpatient procedures for bladder cancer such as cystectomy, which are more influenced by systems of care, are less expensive to perform at high volume centers. Lower risk ambulatory procedures for bladder cancer, such as TURBT, which are not influenced by systems of care, may be more cost efficiently performed by high volume surgeons at low volume centers.

AB - Purpose: We investigated the relationship between provider volume and charges for transurethral bladder tumor resection (TURBT) and radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer. Materials and Methods: The National Inpatient Sample (1988 to 1999) of the Health Care Utilization Project, and State Ambulatory Surgery Databases for Wisconsin and Florida (2000 data set) were used for analysis. All patients with bladder cancer who had undergone radical cystectomy or TURBT as the principal procedure were identified. Hospitals and surgeons were categorized into terciles of volume based on the average number performed per year. The average hospital charge per discharge/procedure corrected to 2000 levels was calculated. One-way ANOVA with the Bonferroni correction was used to compare charges between different volume levels. Results: A total of 13,498 patients who underwent radical cystectomy and 5,954 who underwent TURBT were included in the analysis. Charges for radical cystectomy were $5,648 lower at high volume hospitals than at low volume hospitals (p <0.001). High volume surgeons were $2,976 less expensive than low volume surgeons (p = 0.054). For TURBT total hospital charges at high volume hospitals were $1,013 more than at low volume hospitals (p <0.0001), while average total hospital charges for procedures performed by high volume surgeons were $919 less compared to low volume surgeons (p <0.0001). Conclusions: High risk inpatient procedures for bladder cancer such as cystectomy, which are more influenced by systems of care, are less expensive to perform at high volume centers. Lower risk ambulatory procedures for bladder cancer, such as TURBT, which are not influenced by systems of care, may be more cost efficiently performed by high volume surgeons at low volume centers.

KW - Bladder

KW - Bladder neoplasms

KW - Fees and charges

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4143049183&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4143049183&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.ju.0000136382.51688.21

DO - 10.1097/01.ju.0000136382.51688.21

M3 - Article

C2 - 15311037

AN - SCOPUS:4143049183

VL - 172

SP - 1056

EP - 1061

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 3

ER -