Association between Randall's Plaque Stone Anchors and Renal Papillary Pits

Michael S Borofsky, James C. Williams, Casey A. Dauw, Andrew Cohen, Andrew C. Evan, Fredric L. Coe, Elaine Worcester, James E. Lingeman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: Renal papillary pits are commonly encountered during ureteroscopy. The mechanism by which such pits arise is unclear. One hypothesis is that pits represent sites where stones overgrowing Randall's plaque (RP) were dislodged. We sought to examine this theory by using digital ureteroscopy and stone μCT. Materials and Methods: Patients undergoing endoscopic stone removal had procedures recorded and stones analyzed by using μCT. Stones with evidence of Randall's plaque anchors (RPAs) were identified in a blinded fashion. Surgical videos were reviewed independently by two urologists. Results: Twenty-eight patients had μCT-confirmed stones with RPA. Among them, 93% were recurrent stone formers and 75% had had prior stone procedures. Metabolic abnormalities were present in 87%, with 79% classified as idiopathic calcium oxalate stone formers. A mean of 7.6 stones with RPA were identified per procedure. In each case, papillary pits were visualized before any stone manipulation and in several cases the active dislodgement of an attached stone led to immediate identification of an underlying pit. Such stones routinely demonstrated an RPA on μCT. The average depth of RPA was 302 ± 172 μm, consistent with the corresponding shallow pits visualized on the papillary surface. Conclusions: Stones overgrowing RP are capable of pulling away a piece of papilla when dislodged, resulting in a visible papillary pit. This process manifests as an RPA on the undersurface of the stone and a papillary pit on the corresponding area of attachment. Identification of pits may help identify patients who form stones primarily by the RP mechanism.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)337-342
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Endourology
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019

Fingerprint

Ureteroscopy
Kidney
Calcium Oxalate
Urologists

Keywords

  • Nephrolithiasis
  • calculus
  • ureteroscopy

Cite this

Borofsky, M. S., Williams, J. C., Dauw, C. A., Cohen, A., Evan, A. C., Coe, F. L., ... Lingeman, J. E. (2019). Association between Randall's Plaque Stone Anchors and Renal Papillary Pits. Journal of Endourology, 33(4), 337-342. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0589

Association between Randall's Plaque Stone Anchors and Renal Papillary Pits. / Borofsky, Michael S; Williams, James C.; Dauw, Casey A.; Cohen, Andrew; Evan, Andrew C.; Coe, Fredric L.; Worcester, Elaine; Lingeman, James E.

In: Journal of Endourology, Vol. 33, No. 4, 01.04.2019, p. 337-342.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Borofsky, MS, Williams, JC, Dauw, CA, Cohen, A, Evan, AC, Coe, FL, Worcester, E & Lingeman, JE 2019, 'Association between Randall's Plaque Stone Anchors and Renal Papillary Pits', Journal of Endourology, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 337-342. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0589
Borofsky, Michael S ; Williams, James C. ; Dauw, Casey A. ; Cohen, Andrew ; Evan, Andrew C. ; Coe, Fredric L. ; Worcester, Elaine ; Lingeman, James E. / Association between Randall's Plaque Stone Anchors and Renal Papillary Pits. In: Journal of Endourology. 2019 ; Vol. 33, No. 4. pp. 337-342.
@article{b8940bb87484444db063a48bc1f7cd33,
title = "Association between Randall's Plaque Stone Anchors and Renal Papillary Pits",
abstract = "Introduction: Renal papillary pits are commonly encountered during ureteroscopy. The mechanism by which such pits arise is unclear. One hypothesis is that pits represent sites where stones overgrowing Randall's plaque (RP) were dislodged. We sought to examine this theory by using digital ureteroscopy and stone μCT. Materials and Methods: Patients undergoing endoscopic stone removal had procedures recorded and stones analyzed by using μCT. Stones with evidence of Randall's plaque anchors (RPAs) were identified in a blinded fashion. Surgical videos were reviewed independently by two urologists. Results: Twenty-eight patients had μCT-confirmed stones with RPA. Among them, 93{\%} were recurrent stone formers and 75{\%} had had prior stone procedures. Metabolic abnormalities were present in 87{\%}, with 79{\%} classified as idiopathic calcium oxalate stone formers. A mean of 7.6 stones with RPA were identified per procedure. In each case, papillary pits were visualized before any stone manipulation and in several cases the active dislodgement of an attached stone led to immediate identification of an underlying pit. Such stones routinely demonstrated an RPA on μCT. The average depth of RPA was 302 ± 172 μm, consistent with the corresponding shallow pits visualized on the papillary surface. Conclusions: Stones overgrowing RP are capable of pulling away a piece of papilla when dislodged, resulting in a visible papillary pit. This process manifests as an RPA on the undersurface of the stone and a papillary pit on the corresponding area of attachment. Identification of pits may help identify patients who form stones primarily by the RP mechanism.",
keywords = "Nephrolithiasis, calculus, ureteroscopy",
author = "Borofsky, {Michael S} and Williams, {James C.} and Dauw, {Casey A.} and Andrew Cohen and Evan, {Andrew C.} and Coe, {Fredric L.} and Elaine Worcester and Lingeman, {James E.}",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/end.2018.0589",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "337--342",
journal = "Journal of Endourology",
issn = "0892-7790",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Association between Randall's Plaque Stone Anchors and Renal Papillary Pits

AU - Borofsky, Michael S

AU - Williams, James C.

AU - Dauw, Casey A.

AU - Cohen, Andrew

AU - Evan, Andrew C.

AU - Coe, Fredric L.

AU - Worcester, Elaine

AU - Lingeman, James E.

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Introduction: Renal papillary pits are commonly encountered during ureteroscopy. The mechanism by which such pits arise is unclear. One hypothesis is that pits represent sites where stones overgrowing Randall's plaque (RP) were dislodged. We sought to examine this theory by using digital ureteroscopy and stone μCT. Materials and Methods: Patients undergoing endoscopic stone removal had procedures recorded and stones analyzed by using μCT. Stones with evidence of Randall's plaque anchors (RPAs) were identified in a blinded fashion. Surgical videos were reviewed independently by two urologists. Results: Twenty-eight patients had μCT-confirmed stones with RPA. Among them, 93% were recurrent stone formers and 75% had had prior stone procedures. Metabolic abnormalities were present in 87%, with 79% classified as idiopathic calcium oxalate stone formers. A mean of 7.6 stones with RPA were identified per procedure. In each case, papillary pits were visualized before any stone manipulation and in several cases the active dislodgement of an attached stone led to immediate identification of an underlying pit. Such stones routinely demonstrated an RPA on μCT. The average depth of RPA was 302 ± 172 μm, consistent with the corresponding shallow pits visualized on the papillary surface. Conclusions: Stones overgrowing RP are capable of pulling away a piece of papilla when dislodged, resulting in a visible papillary pit. This process manifests as an RPA on the undersurface of the stone and a papillary pit on the corresponding area of attachment. Identification of pits may help identify patients who form stones primarily by the RP mechanism.

AB - Introduction: Renal papillary pits are commonly encountered during ureteroscopy. The mechanism by which such pits arise is unclear. One hypothesis is that pits represent sites where stones overgrowing Randall's plaque (RP) were dislodged. We sought to examine this theory by using digital ureteroscopy and stone μCT. Materials and Methods: Patients undergoing endoscopic stone removal had procedures recorded and stones analyzed by using μCT. Stones with evidence of Randall's plaque anchors (RPAs) were identified in a blinded fashion. Surgical videos were reviewed independently by two urologists. Results: Twenty-eight patients had μCT-confirmed stones with RPA. Among them, 93% were recurrent stone formers and 75% had had prior stone procedures. Metabolic abnormalities were present in 87%, with 79% classified as idiopathic calcium oxalate stone formers. A mean of 7.6 stones with RPA were identified per procedure. In each case, papillary pits were visualized before any stone manipulation and in several cases the active dislodgement of an attached stone led to immediate identification of an underlying pit. Such stones routinely demonstrated an RPA on μCT. The average depth of RPA was 302 ± 172 μm, consistent with the corresponding shallow pits visualized on the papillary surface. Conclusions: Stones overgrowing RP are capable of pulling away a piece of papilla when dislodged, resulting in a visible papillary pit. This process manifests as an RPA on the undersurface of the stone and a papillary pit on the corresponding area of attachment. Identification of pits may help identify patients who form stones primarily by the RP mechanism.

KW - Nephrolithiasis

KW - calculus

KW - ureteroscopy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064228944&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064228944&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/end.2018.0589

DO - 10.1089/end.2018.0589

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 337

EP - 342

JO - Journal of Endourology

JF - Journal of Endourology

SN - 0892-7790

IS - 4

ER -