Association between alcohol-impaired driving enforcement-related strategies and alcohol-impaired driving

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

All states in the U.S. prohibit alcohol-impaired driving but active law enforcement is necessary for effectively reducing this behavior. Sobriety checkpoints, saturation patrols, open container laws, and media campaigns related to enforcement efforts are all enforcement-related strategies for reducing alcohol-impaired driving. We conducted surveys of all state patrol agencies and a representative sample of local law enforcement agencies to assess their use of alcohol-impaired driving enforcement-related strategies and to determine the relationship between these enforcement-related strategies and self-reported alcohol-impaired driving behavior obtained from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. We found that sobriety checkpoints, saturation patrols, and enforcement of open container laws were associated with a lower prevalence of alcohol-impaired driving but, more importantly, a combination of enforcement-related strategies was associated with a greater decrease in alcohol-impaired driving than any individual enforcement-related activity. In addition, alcohol-impaired driving enforcement-related strategies were associated with decreased alcohol-impaired driving above and beyond their association with decreased binge drinking. Results suggest law enforcement agencies should give greater priority to using a combination of strategies rather than relying on any one individual enforcement activity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)104-109
Number of pages6
JournalAccident Analysis and Prevention
Volume78
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Alcohols
alcohol
Law Enforcement
Law enforcement
law enforcement
Containers
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Binge Drinking
local law
Law
traffic behavior
surveillance
campaign

Keywords

  • Alcohol-impaired driving
  • Enforcement
  • Latent class analysis
  • Open container laws
  • Saturation patrols
  • Sobriety checkpoints

Cite this

@article{a389093c33b44ac28a6643b2e0f8fdfd,
title = "Association between alcohol-impaired driving enforcement-related strategies and alcohol-impaired driving",
abstract = "All states in the U.S. prohibit alcohol-impaired driving but active law enforcement is necessary for effectively reducing this behavior. Sobriety checkpoints, saturation patrols, open container laws, and media campaigns related to enforcement efforts are all enforcement-related strategies for reducing alcohol-impaired driving. We conducted surveys of all state patrol agencies and a representative sample of local law enforcement agencies to assess their use of alcohol-impaired driving enforcement-related strategies and to determine the relationship between these enforcement-related strategies and self-reported alcohol-impaired driving behavior obtained from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. We found that sobriety checkpoints, saturation patrols, and enforcement of open container laws were associated with a lower prevalence of alcohol-impaired driving but, more importantly, a combination of enforcement-related strategies was associated with a greater decrease in alcohol-impaired driving than any individual enforcement-related activity. In addition, alcohol-impaired driving enforcement-related strategies were associated with decreased alcohol-impaired driving above and beyond their association with decreased binge drinking. Results suggest law enforcement agencies should give greater priority to using a combination of strategies rather than relying on any one individual enforcement activity.",
keywords = "Alcohol-impaired driving, Enforcement, Latent class analysis, Open container laws, Saturation patrols, Sobriety checkpoints",
author = "Sanem, {Julia R.} and Erickson, {Darin J.} and Rutledge, {Patricia C.} and Lenk, {Kathleen M.} and Nelson, {Toben F.} and Rhonda Jones-Webb and Toomey, {Traci L.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.aap.2015.02.018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "78",
pages = "104--109",
journal = "Accident Analysis and Prevention",
issn = "0001-4575",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Association between alcohol-impaired driving enforcement-related strategies and alcohol-impaired driving

AU - Sanem, Julia R.

AU - Erickson, Darin J.

AU - Rutledge, Patricia C.

AU - Lenk, Kathleen M.

AU - Nelson, Toben F.

AU - Jones-Webb, Rhonda

AU - Toomey, Traci L.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - All states in the U.S. prohibit alcohol-impaired driving but active law enforcement is necessary for effectively reducing this behavior. Sobriety checkpoints, saturation patrols, open container laws, and media campaigns related to enforcement efforts are all enforcement-related strategies for reducing alcohol-impaired driving. We conducted surveys of all state patrol agencies and a representative sample of local law enforcement agencies to assess their use of alcohol-impaired driving enforcement-related strategies and to determine the relationship between these enforcement-related strategies and self-reported alcohol-impaired driving behavior obtained from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. We found that sobriety checkpoints, saturation patrols, and enforcement of open container laws were associated with a lower prevalence of alcohol-impaired driving but, more importantly, a combination of enforcement-related strategies was associated with a greater decrease in alcohol-impaired driving than any individual enforcement-related activity. In addition, alcohol-impaired driving enforcement-related strategies were associated with decreased alcohol-impaired driving above and beyond their association with decreased binge drinking. Results suggest law enforcement agencies should give greater priority to using a combination of strategies rather than relying on any one individual enforcement activity.

AB - All states in the U.S. prohibit alcohol-impaired driving but active law enforcement is necessary for effectively reducing this behavior. Sobriety checkpoints, saturation patrols, open container laws, and media campaigns related to enforcement efforts are all enforcement-related strategies for reducing alcohol-impaired driving. We conducted surveys of all state patrol agencies and a representative sample of local law enforcement agencies to assess their use of alcohol-impaired driving enforcement-related strategies and to determine the relationship between these enforcement-related strategies and self-reported alcohol-impaired driving behavior obtained from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. We found that sobriety checkpoints, saturation patrols, and enforcement of open container laws were associated with a lower prevalence of alcohol-impaired driving but, more importantly, a combination of enforcement-related strategies was associated with a greater decrease in alcohol-impaired driving than any individual enforcement-related activity. In addition, alcohol-impaired driving enforcement-related strategies were associated with decreased alcohol-impaired driving above and beyond their association with decreased binge drinking. Results suggest law enforcement agencies should give greater priority to using a combination of strategies rather than relying on any one individual enforcement activity.

KW - Alcohol-impaired driving

KW - Enforcement

KW - Latent class analysis

KW - Open container laws

KW - Saturation patrols

KW - Sobriety checkpoints

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924238433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924238433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.aap.2015.02.018

DO - 10.1016/j.aap.2015.02.018

M3 - Article

VL - 78

SP - 104

EP - 109

JO - Accident Analysis and Prevention

JF - Accident Analysis and Prevention

SN - 0001-4575

ER -