Assimilate or Differentiate? Contributors’ Choice of Subjects in User-Generated Content

Zhihong Ke, De Liu, Alok Gupta, Daniel Joseph Brass

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A key to the content diversity on user-generated content platforms is what subject users choose to contribute on. This research investigates how two factors can shape contributors’ subject choice decisions, namely, the amount of existing content and content contributed by online friends or “friend content.” Our experimental findings show that both the amount of existing content and friend content can shape a contributor's subject choice decisions: ceteris paribus, contributors prefer subjects with less existing content and ones with friend content when the amount of existing content is the same. In addition, contributors’ preference for subjects with friend content weakens as the amount of existing content on other subject's decreases. Our findings hold important implications for research and practice in user-generated content platforms and beyond.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalDecision Sciences
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

User-generated content
Factors
Ceteris paribus

Keywords

  • Assimilation
  • Differentiation
  • Social Network Friends
  • Subject Choices
  • User-Generated Content

Cite this

Assimilate or Differentiate? Contributors’ Choice of Subjects in User-Generated Content. / Ke, Zhihong; Liu, De; Gupta, Alok; Brass, Daniel Joseph.

In: Decision Sciences, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6aea24aadbe5418a98beba439ef363eb,
title = "Assimilate or Differentiate? Contributors’ Choice of Subjects in User-Generated Content",
abstract = "A key to the content diversity on user-generated content platforms is what subject users choose to contribute on. This research investigates how two factors can shape contributors’ subject choice decisions, namely, the amount of existing content and content contributed by online friends or “friend content.” Our experimental findings show that both the amount of existing content and friend content can shape a contributor's subject choice decisions: ceteris paribus, contributors prefer subjects with less existing content and ones with friend content when the amount of existing content is the same. In addition, contributors’ preference for subjects with friend content weakens as the amount of existing content on other subject's decreases. Our findings hold important implications for research and practice in user-generated content platforms and beyond.",
keywords = "Assimilation, Differentiation, Social Network Friends, Subject Choices, User-Generated Content",
author = "Zhihong Ke and De Liu and Alok Gupta and Brass, {Daniel Joseph}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/deci.12410",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Decision Sciences",
issn = "0011-7315",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assimilate or Differentiate? Contributors’ Choice of Subjects in User-Generated Content

AU - Ke, Zhihong

AU - Liu, De

AU - Gupta, Alok

AU - Brass, Daniel Joseph

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - A key to the content diversity on user-generated content platforms is what subject users choose to contribute on. This research investigates how two factors can shape contributors’ subject choice decisions, namely, the amount of existing content and content contributed by online friends or “friend content.” Our experimental findings show that both the amount of existing content and friend content can shape a contributor's subject choice decisions: ceteris paribus, contributors prefer subjects with less existing content and ones with friend content when the amount of existing content is the same. In addition, contributors’ preference for subjects with friend content weakens as the amount of existing content on other subject's decreases. Our findings hold important implications for research and practice in user-generated content platforms and beyond.

AB - A key to the content diversity on user-generated content platforms is what subject users choose to contribute on. This research investigates how two factors can shape contributors’ subject choice decisions, namely, the amount of existing content and content contributed by online friends or “friend content.” Our experimental findings show that both the amount of existing content and friend content can shape a contributor's subject choice decisions: ceteris paribus, contributors prefer subjects with less existing content and ones with friend content when the amount of existing content is the same. In addition, contributors’ preference for subjects with friend content weakens as the amount of existing content on other subject's decreases. Our findings hold important implications for research and practice in user-generated content platforms and beyond.

KW - Assimilation

KW - Differentiation

KW - Social Network Friends

KW - Subject Choices

KW - User-Generated Content

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070332922&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070332922&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/deci.12410

DO - 10.1111/deci.12410

M3 - Article

JO - Decision Sciences

JF - Decision Sciences

SN - 0011-7315

ER -