Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Experts@Minnesota Home
Search content at Experts@Minnesota
Home
Profiles
Research units
University Assets
Projects and Grants
Research output
Datasets
Press/Media
Activities
Fellowships, Honors, and Prizes
Impacts
Assessment of Stiff Integration Methods for Supersonic Combustion
Steven M. Cooper
,
Graham V. Candler
Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics
Research output
:
Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
›
Conference contribution
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of Stiff Integration Methods for Supersonic Combustion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Supersonic Combustion
100%
Time Integration Method
100%
Integration Method
100%
Stiff ODE Solver
100%
Strang Splitting
100%
Relative Cost
50%
High-order
50%
Scale Problem
50%
Propulsion System
50%
Scaling Test
50%
Global Model
50%
Stiffness
50%
Shear Layer
50%
Computational Cost
50%
Heat Release
50%
Quantity of Interest
50%
Reaction Zone
50%
Implicit Solver
50%
Reduced Model
50%
Detailed Chemical Kinetics
50%
Chemical Model
50%
Flame Structure
50%
First-order Ordinary Differential Equations
50%
Implicit Large Eddy Simulation
50%
Numerical Stiffness
50%
Reaction Regime
50%
High-speed Propulsion
50%
Chemistry Solvers
50%
Gas Zone
50%
Supersonic Cavity
50%
Species number
50%
Engineering
Integration Method
100%
Supersonic Combustion
100%
Rigidity
66%
Convective
33%
Propulsion System
33%
Implicit Solver
33%
Heat Release
33%
Reaction Zone
33%
Shear Layer
33%
Computational Cost
33%
Large Eddy Simulation
33%
Ordinary differential equations
33%
Physics
Supersonic Combustion
100%
Chemistry
100%
Operators (Mathematics)
33%
Shear Layer
33%
Supersonics
33%
Large Eddy Simulation
33%
Chemistry
Chemistry
100%
Supersonic Combustion
100%
Chemical Kinetics Characteristics
66%
Chemical Engineering
Supersonic Combustion
100%
Chemical Kinetics Characteristics
100%