Assessment of communication, professionalism, and surgical skills in an objective structured performance-related examination (OSPRE): A psychometric study

Alicia Ponton-Carss, Carol Hutchison, Claudio Violato

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability and validity of a performance assessment of communication, professionalism, and surgical skills competencies for surgery residents. METHODS: Fourteen residents from the general surgery program of the University of Calgary were assessed in 7 surgical simulation stations that included communication and professionalism skills. RESULTS: The internal consistency reliability of the checklists and global rating scales combined was adequate for communication (α = .75-.92) and surgical skills (α = .86-.96), but not for professionalism (α = 0). There was evidence of validity as surgical skills performance improved as a function of postgraduate year level but not for the professionalism checklist. Surgical skills and communication correlated in the 2 stations assessed (r = .55 and .57; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence for both reliability and validity for simultaneously assessing surgical skills and communication skills. Further instrument development is required to assess professionalism in a structured examination context.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)433-440
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican journal of surgery
Volume202
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Communication
  • Professional
  • Surgical skills

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of communication, professionalism, and surgical skills in an objective structured performance-related examination (OSPRE): A psychometric study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this