Assessment of Ablative Therapies in Swine: Response of Respiratory Diaphragm to Varying Doses

Ashish Singal, Lars M. Mattison, Charles L. Soule, John R. Ballard, Eric N. Rudie, Erik N.K. Cressman, Paul A Iaizzo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Ablation is a common procedure for treating patients with cancer, cardiac arrhythmia, and other conditions, yet it can cause collateral injury to the respiratory diaphragm. Collateral injury can alter the diaphragm’s properties and/or lead to respiratory dysfunction. Thus, it is important to understand the diaphragm’s physiologic and biomechanical properties in response to ablation therapies, in order to better understand ablative modalities, minimize complications, and maximize the safety and efficacy of ablative procedures. In this study, we analyzed physiologic and biomechanical properties of swine respiratory diaphragm muscle bundles when exposed to 5 ablative modalities. To assess physiologic properties, we performed in vitro tissue bath studies and measured changes in peak force and baseline force. To assess biomechanical properties, we performed uniaxial stress tests, measuring force–displacement responses, stress–strain characteristics, and avulsion forces. After treating the muscle bundles with all 5 ablative modalities, we observed dose-dependent sustained reductions in peak force and transient increases in baseline force—but no consistent dose-dependent biomechanical responses. These data provide novel insights into the effects of various ablative modalities on the respiratory diaphragm, insights that could enable improvements in ablative techniques and therapies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)947-959
Number of pages13
JournalAnnals of Biomedical Engineering
Volume46
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This study was supported by the Institute for Engineering in Medicine at the University of Minnesota, Medtronic, Minnesota Muscle Training Program Grant #2T32ST007612, and Minnesota Partnership for Biotechnology and Medical Genomics Grant #14.31. We gratefully acknowledge Mary Knatterud, Monica Mahre, and Dave Euler for reviewing the manuscript. Dr. Iaizzo has a research contract with Medtronic.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Biomedical Engineering Society.

Keywords

  • Chemical ablation
  • Cryoablation
  • High-intensity focused ultrasound ablation
  • Microwave ablation
  • Radiofrequency ablation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of Ablative Therapies in Swine: Response of Respiratory Diaphragm to Varying Doses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this