Assessment center dimensions: Individual differences correlates and meta-analytic ncremental validity

Stephan Dilchert, Deniz S. Ones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

55 Scopus citations


This study provides an investigation of the nomological net for the seven primary assessment center (AC) dimensions identified by Arthur, Day, McNelly, and Eden (Personnel Psychology, 56, 125-154, 2003). In doing so, the authors provide the first robust estimates of the relationships between all primary AC dimensions with cognitive ability and the Big 5 factors of personality. Additionally, intercorrelations between AC dimensions based on sample sizes much larger than those previously available in the meta-analytic literature are presented. Data were obtained from two large managerial samples (total N=4985). Primary data on AC dimensions, personality, and cognitive ability interrelationships were subsequently integrated with meta-analytic data to estimate incremental validity for optimally and unit-weighted AC dimension composites as well as overall AC ratings over psychometric tests of personality and cognitive ability. Results show that unit- and optimally weighted composites of construct-based AC dimensions add incremental validity over tests of personality and cognitive ability, while overall AC ratings (including those obtained using subjective methods of data combination) do not.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)254-270
Number of pages17
JournalInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment
Issue number3
StatePublished - Sep 2009


Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment center dimensions: Individual differences correlates and meta-analytic ncremental validity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this