Assessing the condition of the Missouri, Ohio, and Upper Mississippi rivers (USA) using diatom-based indicators

Amy R. Kireta; Euan D Reavie; Gerald V. Sgro; Ted R. Angradi; David W. Bolgrien; Terri M. Jicha; Brian H. Hill

doi:10.1007/s10750-012-1067-3

Assessing the condition of the Missouri, Ohio, and Upper Mississippi rivers (USA) using diatom-based indicators

Amy R. Kireta, Euan D Reavie, Gerald V. Sgro, Ted R. Angradi, David W. Bolgrien, Terri M. Jicha, Brian H. Hill

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Diatom-based indicators were developed to assess environmental conditions in the Missouri, Ohio, and Upper Mississippi rivers. Disturbance gradients, comprising the first two principal components derived from a suite of stressor variables, included a trophic gradient (Trophic) and a gradient reflecting agriculture and other development activities (Ag/Dev). Diatom-based indicators were developed by creating models using weighted average calibration and regression-based transfer functions to relate planktonic and periphytic diatom species assemblages to each disturbance gradient. The most predictive disturbance models combined phytoplankton and periphyton assemblages into a single bioindicator model (observed versus inferred: Trophic r ² _root = 0.56; Ag/Dev r ² _root = 0. 70). The geographic applicability of bioindicators was assessed by limiting sample geographical range during model calibrations. Geographic scale was limited by creating bioindicators using samples from: (a) each river, and (b) combined Mississippi/Missouri samples excluding Ohio River sites which were chemically unique. Indicator performance decreased with geographically restrictive models, therefore river basin-wide models, developed across all three rivers, is recommended. The most effective diatom-based disturbance bioindicators for this great river ecosystem could be applied using phytoplankton, periphyton, or combined assemblages to infer both trophic and agriculture/development disturbances.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	171-188
Number of pages	18
Journal	Hydrobiologia
Volume	691
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1067-3
State	Published - Jul 2012

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Acknowledgments Special thanks to Adam Heathcote and Steve Juggins for statistical support and suggestions. We would like to thank all of our EMAP-GRE colleagues for their contributions including: field crews for sample collection and field measures, the EPA Mid-Continent Ecology Division lab in Duluth, Minnesota for chemical analyses, and K. Kennedy and L. Allinger for slide preparations. This study was supported by a grant to E. Reavie from the US Environmental Protection Agency under cooperative agreement CR-83272401. This document has not been subjected to the Agency’s required peer and policy review and therefore does not necessarily reflect the view of the Agency, and no official endorsements should be inferred. This is contribution number 534 of the Center for Water and the Environment, Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota Duluth.

Keywords

Diatoms
Great rivers
Monitoring
Transfer functions

Publisher link

10.1007/s10750-012-1067-3

Find It

Find It at U of M Libraries

Cite this

@article{4a7979765f6f4d2d9f04e9255f1412f6,

title = "Assessing the condition of the Missouri, Ohio, and Upper Mississippi rivers (USA) using diatom-based indicators",

abstract = "Diatom-based indicators were developed to assess environmental conditions in the Missouri, Ohio, and Upper Mississippi rivers. Disturbance gradients, comprising the first two principal components derived from a suite of stressor variables, included a trophic gradient (Trophic) and a gradient reflecting agriculture and other development activities (Ag/Dev). Diatom-based indicators were developed by creating models using weighted average calibration and regression-based transfer functions to relate planktonic and periphytic diatom species assemblages to each disturbance gradient. The most predictive disturbance models combined phytoplankton and periphyton assemblages into a single bioindicator model (observed versus inferred: Trophic r 2 root = 0.56; Ag/Dev r 2 root = 0. 70). The geographic applicability of bioindicators was assessed by limiting sample geographical range during model calibrations. Geographic scale was limited by creating bioindicators using samples from: (a) each river, and (b) combined Mississippi/Missouri samples excluding Ohio River sites which were chemically unique. Indicator performance decreased with geographically restrictive models, therefore river basin-wide models, developed across all three rivers, is recommended. The most effective diatom-based disturbance bioindicators for this great river ecosystem could be applied using phytoplankton, periphyton, or combined assemblages to infer both trophic and agriculture/development disturbances.",

keywords = "Diatoms, Great rivers, Monitoring, Transfer functions",

author = "Kireta, {Amy R.} and Reavie, {Euan D} and Sgro, {Gerald V.} and Angradi, {Ted R.} and Bolgrien, {David W.} and Jicha, {Terri M.} and Hill, {Brian H.}",

note = "Funding Information: Acknowledgments Special thanks to Adam Heathcote and Steve Juggins for statistical support and suggestions. We would like to thank all of our EMAP-GRE colleagues for their contributions including: field crews for sample collection and field measures, the EPA Mid-Continent Ecology Division lab in Duluth, Minnesota for chemical analyses, and K. Kennedy and L. Allinger for slide preparations. This study was supported by a grant to E. Reavie from the US Environmental Protection Agency under cooperative agreement CR-83272401. This document has not been subjected to the Agency{\textquoteright}s required peer and policy review and therefore does not necessarily reflect the view of the Agency, and no official endorsements should be inferred. This is contribution number 534 of the Center for Water and the Environment, Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota Duluth.",

year = "2012",

month = jul,

doi = "10.1007/s10750-012-1067-3",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "691",

pages = "171--188",

journal = "Hydrobiologia",

issn = "0018-8158",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the condition of the Missouri, Ohio, and Upper Mississippi rivers (USA) using diatom-based indicators

AU - Kireta, Amy R.

AU - Reavie, Euan D

AU - Sgro, Gerald V.

AU - Angradi, Ted R.

AU - Bolgrien, David W.

AU - Jicha, Terri M.

AU - Hill, Brian H.

N1 - Funding Information: Acknowledgments Special thanks to Adam Heathcote and Steve Juggins for statistical support and suggestions. We would like to thank all of our EMAP-GRE colleagues for their contributions including: field crews for sample collection and field measures, the EPA Mid-Continent Ecology Division lab in Duluth, Minnesota for chemical analyses, and K. Kennedy and L. Allinger for slide preparations. This study was supported by a grant to E. Reavie from the US Environmental Protection Agency under cooperative agreement CR-83272401. This document has not been subjected to the Agency’s required peer and policy review and therefore does not necessarily reflect the view of the Agency, and no official endorsements should be inferred. This is contribution number 534 of the Center for Water and the Environment, Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota Duluth.

PY - 2012/7

Y1 - 2012/7

N2 - Diatom-based indicators were developed to assess environmental conditions in the Missouri, Ohio, and Upper Mississippi rivers. Disturbance gradients, comprising the first two principal components derived from a suite of stressor variables, included a trophic gradient (Trophic) and a gradient reflecting agriculture and other development activities (Ag/Dev). Diatom-based indicators were developed by creating models using weighted average calibration and regression-based transfer functions to relate planktonic and periphytic diatom species assemblages to each disturbance gradient. The most predictive disturbance models combined phytoplankton and periphyton assemblages into a single bioindicator model (observed versus inferred: Trophic r 2 root = 0.56; Ag/Dev r 2 root = 0. 70). The geographic applicability of bioindicators was assessed by limiting sample geographical range during model calibrations. Geographic scale was limited by creating bioindicators using samples from: (a) each river, and (b) combined Mississippi/Missouri samples excluding Ohio River sites which were chemically unique. Indicator performance decreased with geographically restrictive models, therefore river basin-wide models, developed across all three rivers, is recommended. The most effective diatom-based disturbance bioindicators for this great river ecosystem could be applied using phytoplankton, periphyton, or combined assemblages to infer both trophic and agriculture/development disturbances.

AB - Diatom-based indicators were developed to assess environmental conditions in the Missouri, Ohio, and Upper Mississippi rivers. Disturbance gradients, comprising the first two principal components derived from a suite of stressor variables, included a trophic gradient (Trophic) and a gradient reflecting agriculture and other development activities (Ag/Dev). Diatom-based indicators were developed by creating models using weighted average calibration and regression-based transfer functions to relate planktonic and periphytic diatom species assemblages to each disturbance gradient. The most predictive disturbance models combined phytoplankton and periphyton assemblages into a single bioindicator model (observed versus inferred: Trophic r 2 root = 0.56; Ag/Dev r 2 root = 0. 70). The geographic applicability of bioindicators was assessed by limiting sample geographical range during model calibrations. Geographic scale was limited by creating bioindicators using samples from: (a) each river, and (b) combined Mississippi/Missouri samples excluding Ohio River sites which were chemically unique. Indicator performance decreased with geographically restrictive models, therefore river basin-wide models, developed across all three rivers, is recommended. The most effective diatom-based disturbance bioindicators for this great river ecosystem could be applied using phytoplankton, periphyton, or combined assemblages to infer both trophic and agriculture/development disturbances.

KW - Diatoms

KW - Great rivers

KW - Monitoring

KW - Transfer functions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861634342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861634342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10750-012-1067-3

DO - 10.1007/s10750-012-1067-3

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84861634342

SN - 0018-8158

VL - 691

SP - 171

EP - 188

JO - Hydrobiologia

JF - Hydrobiologia

IS - 1

ER -

Assessing the condition of the Missouri, Ohio, and Upper Mississippi rivers (USA) using diatom-based indicators

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Publisher link

Find It

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this