Assessing the Clinical Requirement of 2.5% Phenylephrine for Diagnostic Pupil Examination

Junsang Cho, Brent Bruck, James C. Liu, Susan M. Culican

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate whether the standard dilating drop regimen consisting of phenylephrine, tropicamide, and proparacaine produces clinically significant improvement in pupil size compared to tropicamide and proparacaine during diagnostic eye examination. Methods: Sixty-three adult patients at Washington University School of Medicine Eye Clinic were enrolled in this prospective, randomized trial. Each patient received one of two dilating drop regimens: phenylephrine + tropicamide + proparacaine (PE+T+PP), which is considered the standard therapy, or tropicamide + proparacaine (T+PP). Main outcome measures were the proportion of pupils able to achieve successful clinical examination without need for additional dilating drops and change in predilation to postdilation pupil size. Comparisons were made using McNemar's test, repeated measures analysis of variance, and Fisher's test to determine whether PE is a necessary component of the standard eye examination. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the PE+T+PP and T+PE treatment groups in predilation to postdilation changes in average resting pupil size (1.58 ± 0.66 and 2.61 ± 0.79; P = 0.57) or constricted pupil size (2.52 ± 0.93 and 3.56 ± 0.96; P = 0.15). There was no statistically significant difference between patients who obtained a successful dilated pupil examination between those receiving PE+T+PP and those receiving T+PP as determined by the examining physicians (Fisher's, P = 0.67). Conclusion: The addition of phenylephrine to tropicamide and proparacaine did not improve pupillary dilation size or ability to conduct a clinical examination. A single dilating agent using tropicamide should be considered in clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)284-289
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Volume37
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work was supported by awards to the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences at Washington University from a Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., unrestricted grant (New York, NY) and the National Eye Institute of the National Institutes of Health Vision Core Grant (P30 EY002687). The funding organizations had no role in the design or conduct of this research.

Publisher Copyright:
© Junsang Cho et al. 2021; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2021.

Keywords

  • clinical utility
  • dilating agent
  • eye examination
  • phenylephrine
  • tropicamide

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing the Clinical Requirement of 2.5% Phenylephrine for Diagnostic Pupil Examination'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this