Assessing student written problem solutions: A problem-solving rubric with application to introductory physics

Jennifer L. Docktor, Jay Dornfeld, Evan Frodermann, Ken Heller, Leonardo Hsu, Koblar Alan Jackson, Andrew Mason, Qing X. Ryan, Jie Yang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Problem solving is a complex process valuable in everyday life and crucial for learning in the STEM fields. To support the development of problem-solving skills it is important for researchers and curriculum developers to have practical tools that can measure the difference between novice and expert problem-solving performance in authentic classroom work. It is also useful if such tools can be employed by instructors to guide their pedagogy. We describe the design, development, and testing of a simple rubric to assess written solutions to problems given in undergraduate introductory physics courses. In particular, we present evidence for the validity, reliability, and utility of the instrument. The rubric identifies five general problem-solving processes and defines the criteria to attain a score in each: organizing problem information into a Useful Description, selecting appropriate principles (Physics Approach), applying those principles to the specific conditions in the problem (Specific Application of Physics), using Mathematical Procedures appropriately, and displaying evidence of an organized reasoning pattern (Logical Progression).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number010130
JournalPhysical Review Physics Education Research
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 11 2016

Fingerprint

problem solving
students
physics
student
instructors
photographic developers
organizing
progressions
learning
everyday life
evidence
instructor
expert
curriculum
classroom
performance

Cite this

Assessing student written problem solutions : A problem-solving rubric with application to introductory physics. / Docktor, Jennifer L.; Dornfeld, Jay; Frodermann, Evan; Heller, Ken; Hsu, Leonardo; Jackson, Koblar Alan; Mason, Andrew; Ryan, Qing X.; Yang, Jie.

In: Physical Review Physics Education Research, Vol. 12, No. 1, 010130, 11.05.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Docktor, Jennifer L. ; Dornfeld, Jay ; Frodermann, Evan ; Heller, Ken ; Hsu, Leonardo ; Jackson, Koblar Alan ; Mason, Andrew ; Ryan, Qing X. ; Yang, Jie. / Assessing student written problem solutions : A problem-solving rubric with application to introductory physics. In: Physical Review Physics Education Research. 2016 ; Vol. 12, No. 1.
@article{9831211e9293426d8610a8fde24cadf4,
title = "Assessing student written problem solutions: A problem-solving rubric with application to introductory physics",
abstract = "Problem solving is a complex process valuable in everyday life and crucial for learning in the STEM fields. To support the development of problem-solving skills it is important for researchers and curriculum developers to have practical tools that can measure the difference between novice and expert problem-solving performance in authentic classroom work. It is also useful if such tools can be employed by instructors to guide their pedagogy. We describe the design, development, and testing of a simple rubric to assess written solutions to problems given in undergraduate introductory physics courses. In particular, we present evidence for the validity, reliability, and utility of the instrument. The rubric identifies five general problem-solving processes and defines the criteria to attain a score in each: organizing problem information into a Useful Description, selecting appropriate principles (Physics Approach), applying those principles to the specific conditions in the problem (Specific Application of Physics), using Mathematical Procedures appropriately, and displaying evidence of an organized reasoning pattern (Logical Progression).",
author = "Docktor, {Jennifer L.} and Jay Dornfeld and Evan Frodermann and Ken Heller and Leonardo Hsu and Jackson, {Koblar Alan} and Andrew Mason and Ryan, {Qing X.} and Jie Yang",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010130",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
journal = "Physical Review Physics Education Research",
issn = "2469-9896",
publisher = "American Physical Society",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing student written problem solutions

T2 - A problem-solving rubric with application to introductory physics

AU - Docktor, Jennifer L.

AU - Dornfeld, Jay

AU - Frodermann, Evan

AU - Heller, Ken

AU - Hsu, Leonardo

AU - Jackson, Koblar Alan

AU - Mason, Andrew

AU - Ryan, Qing X.

AU - Yang, Jie

PY - 2016/5/11

Y1 - 2016/5/11

N2 - Problem solving is a complex process valuable in everyday life and crucial for learning in the STEM fields. To support the development of problem-solving skills it is important for researchers and curriculum developers to have practical tools that can measure the difference between novice and expert problem-solving performance in authentic classroom work. It is also useful if such tools can be employed by instructors to guide their pedagogy. We describe the design, development, and testing of a simple rubric to assess written solutions to problems given in undergraduate introductory physics courses. In particular, we present evidence for the validity, reliability, and utility of the instrument. The rubric identifies five general problem-solving processes and defines the criteria to attain a score in each: organizing problem information into a Useful Description, selecting appropriate principles (Physics Approach), applying those principles to the specific conditions in the problem (Specific Application of Physics), using Mathematical Procedures appropriately, and displaying evidence of an organized reasoning pattern (Logical Progression).

AB - Problem solving is a complex process valuable in everyday life and crucial for learning in the STEM fields. To support the development of problem-solving skills it is important for researchers and curriculum developers to have practical tools that can measure the difference between novice and expert problem-solving performance in authentic classroom work. It is also useful if such tools can be employed by instructors to guide their pedagogy. We describe the design, development, and testing of a simple rubric to assess written solutions to problems given in undergraduate introductory physics courses. In particular, we present evidence for the validity, reliability, and utility of the instrument. The rubric identifies five general problem-solving processes and defines the criteria to attain a score in each: organizing problem information into a Useful Description, selecting appropriate principles (Physics Approach), applying those principles to the specific conditions in the problem (Specific Application of Physics), using Mathematical Procedures appropriately, and displaying evidence of an organized reasoning pattern (Logical Progression).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019496748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019496748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010130

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010130

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85019496748

VL - 12

JO - Physical Review Physics Education Research

JF - Physical Review Physics Education Research

SN - 2469-9896

IS - 1

M1 - 010130

ER -