Assessing Methods for Assigning SNPs to Genes in Gene-Based Tests of Association Using Common Variants

Ashley Petersen, Carolina Alvarez, Scott DeClaire, Nathan L. Tintle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations


Gene-based tests of association are frequently applied to common SNPs (MAF>5%) as an alternative to single-marker tests. In this analysis we conduct a variety of simulation studies applied to five popular gene-based tests investigating general trends related to their performance in realistic situations. In particular, we focus on the impact of non-causal SNPs and a variety of LD structures on the behavior of these tests. Ultimately, we find that non-causal SNPs can significantly impact the power of all gene-based tests. On average, we find that the "noise" from 6-12 non-causal SNPs will cancel out the "signal" of one causal SNP across five popular gene-based tests. Furthermore, we find complex and differing behavior of the methods in the presence of LD within and between non-causal and causal SNPs. Ultimately, better approaches for a priori prioritization of potentially causal SNPs (e.g., predicting functionality of non-synonymous SNPs), application of these methods to sequenced or fully imputed datasets, and limited use of window-based methods for assigning inter-genic SNPs to genes will improve power. However, significant power loss from non-causal SNPs may remain unless alternative statistical approaches robust to the inclusion of non-causal SNPs are developed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere62161
JournalPloS one
Issue number5
StatePublished - May 31 2013


Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing Methods for Assigning SNPs to Genes in Gene-Based Tests of Association Using Common Variants'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this