Assessing communications competencies through reviews of client interactions and comprehensive rotation assessment: A comparison of methods

Margaret V Root Kustritz, Susan E Lowum, Kristi Flynn, Heather Fairbairn, Athena Diesch-Chham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study was to compare two methods for assessing student communication skills: A labor-intensive review of video-recorded interactions and global communications assessment using a comprehensive rotation-Assessment tool. Secondary goals of the study were to evaluate student strengths and weaknesses to inform the pre-clinical communications curriculum and to evaluate for consistency between types of reviewers. Video recordings of 43 student encounters with clients presenting their animals for wellness or diagnostic appointments to the primary care service at a veterinary teaching hospital were reviewed by one of three primary care clinicians, a social worker, and a clinical communications instructor, using a common rubric. Scores using the rubric were compared with overall scores for verbal communications on a comprehensive rotation-Assessment tool, both for the primary care rotation and for other small-Animal rotations. Duration did not vary significantly between wellness and diagnostic appointments, or between dog and cat appointments. Scores achieved by students on video review varied by evaluator, with the clinical communications instructor scoring students the lowest and the social worker scoring students the highest. Strengths identified included greeting the client appropriately, gathering initial information about the reason for the visit, and using lay terminology appropriately. Weaknesses included summarizing information for the client, talking to clients about money, and making strong recommendations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)290-301
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of veterinary medical education
Volume44
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017

Fingerprint

comparison of methods
animal communication
students
communications
Communication
Students
interaction
Primary Health Care
Appointments and Schedules
student
teachers
social worker
instructor
diagnostic
video
animal
methodology
communication skills
Animal Hospitals
verbal communication

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Communications
  • Competency
  • Education
  • Veterinary

Cite this

@article{a64975286e7441d9b5214b914df4c5a4,
title = "Assessing communications competencies through reviews of client interactions and comprehensive rotation assessment: A comparison of methods",
abstract = "The primary purpose of this study was to compare two methods for assessing student communication skills: A labor-intensive review of video-recorded interactions and global communications assessment using a comprehensive rotation-Assessment tool. Secondary goals of the study were to evaluate student strengths and weaknesses to inform the pre-clinical communications curriculum and to evaluate for consistency between types of reviewers. Video recordings of 43 student encounters with clients presenting their animals for wellness or diagnostic appointments to the primary care service at a veterinary teaching hospital were reviewed by one of three primary care clinicians, a social worker, and a clinical communications instructor, using a common rubric. Scores using the rubric were compared with overall scores for verbal communications on a comprehensive rotation-Assessment tool, both for the primary care rotation and for other small-Animal rotations. Duration did not vary significantly between wellness and diagnostic appointments, or between dog and cat appointments. Scores achieved by students on video review varied by evaluator, with the clinical communications instructor scoring students the lowest and the social worker scoring students the highest. Strengths identified included greeting the client appropriately, gathering initial information about the reason for the visit, and using lay terminology appropriately. Weaknesses included summarizing information for the client, talking to clients about money, and making strong recommendations.",
keywords = "Assessment, Communications, Competency, Education, Veterinary",
author = "{Root Kustritz}, {Margaret V} and Lowum, {Susan E} and Kristi Flynn and Heather Fairbairn and Athena Diesch-Chham",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3138/jvme.1116-184R",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "290--301",
journal = "Journal of Veterinary Medical Education",
issn = "0748-321X",
publisher = "University of Toronto Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing communications competencies through reviews of client interactions and comprehensive rotation assessment

T2 - A comparison of methods

AU - Root Kustritz, Margaret V

AU - Lowum, Susan E

AU - Flynn, Kristi

AU - Fairbairn, Heather

AU - Diesch-Chham, Athena

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - The primary purpose of this study was to compare two methods for assessing student communication skills: A labor-intensive review of video-recorded interactions and global communications assessment using a comprehensive rotation-Assessment tool. Secondary goals of the study were to evaluate student strengths and weaknesses to inform the pre-clinical communications curriculum and to evaluate for consistency between types of reviewers. Video recordings of 43 student encounters with clients presenting their animals for wellness or diagnostic appointments to the primary care service at a veterinary teaching hospital were reviewed by one of three primary care clinicians, a social worker, and a clinical communications instructor, using a common rubric. Scores using the rubric were compared with overall scores for verbal communications on a comprehensive rotation-Assessment tool, both for the primary care rotation and for other small-Animal rotations. Duration did not vary significantly between wellness and diagnostic appointments, or between dog and cat appointments. Scores achieved by students on video review varied by evaluator, with the clinical communications instructor scoring students the lowest and the social worker scoring students the highest. Strengths identified included greeting the client appropriately, gathering initial information about the reason for the visit, and using lay terminology appropriately. Weaknesses included summarizing information for the client, talking to clients about money, and making strong recommendations.

AB - The primary purpose of this study was to compare two methods for assessing student communication skills: A labor-intensive review of video-recorded interactions and global communications assessment using a comprehensive rotation-Assessment tool. Secondary goals of the study were to evaluate student strengths and weaknesses to inform the pre-clinical communications curriculum and to evaluate for consistency between types of reviewers. Video recordings of 43 student encounters with clients presenting their animals for wellness or diagnostic appointments to the primary care service at a veterinary teaching hospital were reviewed by one of three primary care clinicians, a social worker, and a clinical communications instructor, using a common rubric. Scores using the rubric were compared with overall scores for verbal communications on a comprehensive rotation-Assessment tool, both for the primary care rotation and for other small-Animal rotations. Duration did not vary significantly between wellness and diagnostic appointments, or between dog and cat appointments. Scores achieved by students on video review varied by evaluator, with the clinical communications instructor scoring students the lowest and the social worker scoring students the highest. Strengths identified included greeting the client appropriately, gathering initial information about the reason for the visit, and using lay terminology appropriately. Weaknesses included summarizing information for the client, talking to clients about money, and making strong recommendations.

KW - Assessment

KW - Communications

KW - Competency

KW - Education

KW - Veterinary

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024499711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024499711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3138/jvme.1116-184R

DO - 10.3138/jvme.1116-184R

M3 - Article

C2 - 28375071

AN - SCOPUS:85024499711

VL - 44

SP - 290

EP - 301

JO - Journal of Veterinary Medical Education

JF - Journal of Veterinary Medical Education

SN - 0748-321X

IS - 2

ER -