Assessing Bibliographic Inaccuracy as a Contributing Factor for Unintended Loss in Shared Print Monograph Programs

Helen N. Levenson, Sara Amato, Ian Bogus, Fern E. Brody, Mary Miller, Jacob Nadal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Shared print programs are helping their member libraries right-size their collections. As they do, there are concerns about the adverse impact of bibliographic inaccura- cies. This paper studies bibliographic record inaccuracies and the resulting frequency of mismatches between an item owned and the record representing ownership. Through analysis of interlibrary loan (ILL) survey data, the authors found an overall low rate of bibliographic inaccuracy, and that inaccuracies rarely prevented library staff from verifying the ownership of the item. The authors review how this finding contributes to confidence in library holding records, which is necessary for evaluating the optimal number of copies in shared print networks and for minimizing the risk in withdrawal decisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number1021
JournalCollege and Research Libraries
Volume85
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Helen N. Levenson, Sara Amato, Ian Bogus, Fern E. Brody, Mary Miller, and Jacob Nadal.

Keywords

  • Bibliographic inaccuracy
  • Collection management
  • Shared print programs
  • Shared print retention commitments

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing Bibliographic Inaccuracy as a Contributing Factor for Unintended Loss in Shared Print Monograph Programs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this