Are both parents always better than one? Parental conflict and young adult well-being

Kelly Musick, Ann Meier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

62 Scopus citations


Using data from three waves of the National Survey of Families and Households (N=1963), we examine associations between adolescent family experiences and young adult well-being across a range of indicators, including schooling, substance use, and family-related transitions. We compare children living with both biological parents, but whose parents differ in how often they argue, to children in stepfather and single-mother families, and we assess the extent to which differences can be understood in terms of family income and parenting practices. Findings suggest that parental conflict is associated with children's poorer academic achievement, increased substance use, and early family formation and dissolution. Living in single-mother and stepfather families tend to be more strongly associated with our indicators of well-being, although differences between these family types and living with high conflict continuously married parents are often statistically indistinguishable. Income and parenting largely do not account for associations between adolescent family type and later life outcomes. We conclude that while children do better, on average, living with two biological married parents, the advantages of two-parent families are not shared equally by all.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)814-830
Number of pages17
JournalSocial Science Research
Issue number5
StatePublished - Sep 2010


  • Family structure
  • Parental conflict
  • Parenting
  • Transition to adulthood

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Are both parents always better than one? Parental conflict and young adult well-being'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this