Abstract
Autoregressive (AR) and Autoregressive-moving average (ARMA) methods of spectral analysis have been developed and are being increasingly used as alternatives to traditional methods of spectral analysis. Two of these methods developed by Marple and Friedlander are tested in this study by using generated data from models with known spectra. The Blackman-Tukey spectral estimates are also compared to the Marple and Friedlander estimates. The variability of the Marple and Friedlander estimates with sample sizes is investigated. Although both Marple's and Friedlander's methods are satisfactory, Friedlander's method is preferred because of its ability to handle a wider class of models.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 35-50 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Stochastic Hydrology and Hydraulics |
Volume | 2 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 1988 |
Keywords
- Stochastic models
- spectral analysis