APRN Consensus Model Implementation: The Minnesota Experience

Julie Ann Sabo; Mary L Chesney; Mary Fran Tracy; Mary Fran Tracy

doi:10.1016/S2155-8256(17)30093-5

APRN Consensus Model Implementation: The Minnesota Experience

Julie Ann Sabo, Mary L Chesney, Mary Fran Tracy, Mary Fran Tracy

Academics (Nursing)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

In 2015, more than 16 years of strategic work resulted in the removal of statutory barriers to Minnesota advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) practice. Keys to the passage of the legislation were the creation of a formal infrastructure (Minnesota APRN Coalition) to manage financial and communication strategies, cohesion among all four roles of APRNs, engagement of strong legislative authors and bipartisan support, and valuable partnerships among the coalition and external stakeholders, such as the Minnesota Board of Nursing. The rapid implementation of the law presented the board with distinct challenges. The purpose of this article is to present the experience of implementing the 2008 APRN Consensus Model to assist other states.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	10-16
Number of pages	7
Journal	Journal of Nursing Regulation
Volume	8
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/S2155-8256(17)30093-5
State	Published - Jul 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 National Council of State Boards of Nursing

Keywords

Advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs)
expansion of scope of practice
legislation

Publisher link

10.1016/S2155-8256(17)30093-5

Find It

Find It at U of M Libraries

Cite this

@article{c68fbfcd16f746bfb986f1f10078b5cc,

title = "APRN Consensus Model Implementation: The Minnesota Experience",

abstract = "In 2015, more than 16 years of strategic work resulted in the removal of statutory barriers to Minnesota advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) practice. Keys to the passage of the legislation were the creation of a formal infrastructure (Minnesota APRN Coalition) to manage financial and communication strategies, cohesion among all four roles of APRNs, engagement of strong legislative authors and bipartisan support, and valuable partnerships among the coalition and external stakeholders, such as the Minnesota Board of Nursing. The rapid implementation of the law presented the board with distinct challenges. The purpose of this article is to present the experience of implementing the 2008 APRN Consensus Model to assist other states.",

keywords = "Advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs), expansion of scope of practice, legislation",

author = "Sabo, {Julie Ann} and Chesney, {Mary L} and Tracy, {Mary Fran} and Tracy, {Mary Fran}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017 National Council of State Boards of Nursing",

year = "2017",

month = jul,

doi = "10.1016/S2155-8256(17)30093-5",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "8",

pages = "10--16",

journal = "Journal of Nursing Regulation",

issn = "2155-8256",

publisher = "National Council of State Boards of Nursing",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - APRN Consensus Model Implementation

T2 - The Minnesota Experience

AU - Sabo, Julie Ann

AU - Chesney, Mary L

AU - Tracy, Mary Fran

PY - 2017/7

Y1 - 2017/7

N2 - In 2015, more than 16 years of strategic work resulted in the removal of statutory barriers to Minnesota advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) practice. Keys to the passage of the legislation were the creation of a formal infrastructure (Minnesota APRN Coalition) to manage financial and communication strategies, cohesion among all four roles of APRNs, engagement of strong legislative authors and bipartisan support, and valuable partnerships among the coalition and external stakeholders, such as the Minnesota Board of Nursing. The rapid implementation of the law presented the board with distinct challenges. The purpose of this article is to present the experience of implementing the 2008 APRN Consensus Model to assist other states.

AB - In 2015, more than 16 years of strategic work resulted in the removal of statutory barriers to Minnesota advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) practice. Keys to the passage of the legislation were the creation of a formal infrastructure (Minnesota APRN Coalition) to manage financial and communication strategies, cohesion among all four roles of APRNs, engagement of strong legislative authors and bipartisan support, and valuable partnerships among the coalition and external stakeholders, such as the Minnesota Board of Nursing. The rapid implementation of the law presented the board with distinct challenges. The purpose of this article is to present the experience of implementing the 2008 APRN Consensus Model to assist other states.

KW - Advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs)

KW - expansion of scope of practice

KW - legislation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021839749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021839749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S2155-8256(17)30093-5

DO - 10.1016/S2155-8256(17)30093-5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85021839749

SN - 2155-8256

VL - 8

SP - 10

EP - 16

JO - Journal of Nursing Regulation

JF - Journal of Nursing Regulation

IS - 2

ER -

APRN Consensus Model Implementation: The Minnesota Experience

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Publisher link

Find It

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this