Abstract
Unlike previous research that found small differences between population standard deviations and applicant pool standard deviations (P. R. Sackett & D. J. Ostgaard, 1994; D. S. Ones & C. Viswesvaran, 2003), this study revealed a 23% disparity between Law School Admission Test (LSAT) scores of all LSAT test takers and those of LSAT test takers who applied to law school. This study also illustrated robust applicant self-selection behavior across different law school ranks. These findings are important, because predictor scores of applicants who know their scores in advance and perceive small selection ratios necessitate substantially smaller range restriction corrections than those that would be required by population standard deviations. Furthermore, these findings more generally reveal that applicants who know their scores in advance behave quite differently from applicants who do not. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 586-593 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Journal of Applied Psychology |
Volume | 92 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 1 2007 |
Keywords
- Applicant
- Cognitive ability
- Range restriction
- Standardized test