Application of latent profile analysis to define subgroups of parenting styles and food parenting practices

Karen M. Jennings, Katie Loth, Allan D. Tate, Michael H Miner, Jerica M Berge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Food parenting practices and parenting styles are associated with child weight status, dietary intake, and eating behaviors. Although parents maintain a parenting style while also engaging in food parenting practices day-to-day, most studies have examined the separate impact of these two constructs on child outcomes. An examination of both practices and styles will facilitate the identification of how they mutually co-exist and influence child weight and weight-related outcomes. The current study examined the clustering of food parenting practices and parenting styles and evaluated the relationship between these parenting characteristics and child weight status, diet quality and eating behaviors. Children aged 5–7 and their parents (N = 150) from six racial/ethnic groups were recruited through primary care clinics. Latent class analysis classified subgroups based on parenting practices and styles. Regression analyses examined relationships between subgroups and child outcomes. The best-fitting model was two subgroups. Parents in subgroup 1 (n = 37) were more likely to restrict foods, pressure children to eat and less likely to engage in food modeling compared to subgroup 2 (n = 112). Parents in subgroup 1 were more likely to report authoritarian and permissive parenting styles and less likely to report an authoritative parenting style, compared to subgroup 2. Parents in subgroup 1 were more likely to report children who ate to obtain pleasure and who lacked internal cues for hunger than those in subgroup 2. There were no association between subgroups and child weight status, diet quality and other eating behaviors. Future research and interventions should take into consideration how parenting styles and practices mutually influence child weight and weight-related outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)8-18
Number of pages11
JournalAppetite
Volume139
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2019

Fingerprint

Parenting
Food
Weights and Measures
Parents
Feeding Behavior
Diet
Pleasure
Hunger
Ethnic Groups
Cues
Cluster Analysis
Primary Health Care
Regression Analysis
Pressure

Keywords

  • Behaviors
  • Child weight
  • Eating
  • Latent class analysis
  • Parenting practices
  • Parenting styles

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Cite this

Application of latent profile analysis to define subgroups of parenting styles and food parenting practices. / Jennings, Karen M.; Loth, Katie; Tate, Allan D.; Miner, Michael H; Berge, Jerica M.

In: Appetite, Vol. 139, 01.08.2019, p. 8-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{11c7c5cb2a0941d9b2ad4453ff2e47c4,
title = "Application of latent profile analysis to define subgroups of parenting styles and food parenting practices",
abstract = "Food parenting practices and parenting styles are associated with child weight status, dietary intake, and eating behaviors. Although parents maintain a parenting style while also engaging in food parenting practices day-to-day, most studies have examined the separate impact of these two constructs on child outcomes. An examination of both practices and styles will facilitate the identification of how they mutually co-exist and influence child weight and weight-related outcomes. The current study examined the clustering of food parenting practices and parenting styles and evaluated the relationship between these parenting characteristics and child weight status, diet quality and eating behaviors. Children aged 5–7 and their parents (N = 150) from six racial/ethnic groups were recruited through primary care clinics. Latent class analysis classified subgroups based on parenting practices and styles. Regression analyses examined relationships between subgroups and child outcomes. The best-fitting model was two subgroups. Parents in subgroup 1 (n = 37) were more likely to restrict foods, pressure children to eat and less likely to engage in food modeling compared to subgroup 2 (n = 112). Parents in subgroup 1 were more likely to report authoritarian and permissive parenting styles and less likely to report an authoritative parenting style, compared to subgroup 2. Parents in subgroup 1 were more likely to report children who ate to obtain pleasure and who lacked internal cues for hunger than those in subgroup 2. There were no association between subgroups and child weight status, diet quality and other eating behaviors. Future research and interventions should take into consideration how parenting styles and practices mutually influence child weight and weight-related outcomes.",
keywords = "Behaviors, Child weight, Eating, Latent class analysis, Parenting practices, Parenting styles",
author = "Jennings, {Karen M.} and Katie Loth and Tate, {Allan D.} and Miner, {Michael H} and Berge, {Jerica M}",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.appet.2019.04.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "139",
pages = "8--18",
journal = "Appetite",
issn = "0195-6663",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Application of latent profile analysis to define subgroups of parenting styles and food parenting practices

AU - Jennings, Karen M.

AU - Loth, Katie

AU - Tate, Allan D.

AU - Miner, Michael H

AU - Berge, Jerica M

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - Food parenting practices and parenting styles are associated with child weight status, dietary intake, and eating behaviors. Although parents maintain a parenting style while also engaging in food parenting practices day-to-day, most studies have examined the separate impact of these two constructs on child outcomes. An examination of both practices and styles will facilitate the identification of how they mutually co-exist and influence child weight and weight-related outcomes. The current study examined the clustering of food parenting practices and parenting styles and evaluated the relationship between these parenting characteristics and child weight status, diet quality and eating behaviors. Children aged 5–7 and their parents (N = 150) from six racial/ethnic groups were recruited through primary care clinics. Latent class analysis classified subgroups based on parenting practices and styles. Regression analyses examined relationships between subgroups and child outcomes. The best-fitting model was two subgroups. Parents in subgroup 1 (n = 37) were more likely to restrict foods, pressure children to eat and less likely to engage in food modeling compared to subgroup 2 (n = 112). Parents in subgroup 1 were more likely to report authoritarian and permissive parenting styles and less likely to report an authoritative parenting style, compared to subgroup 2. Parents in subgroup 1 were more likely to report children who ate to obtain pleasure and who lacked internal cues for hunger than those in subgroup 2. There were no association between subgroups and child weight status, diet quality and other eating behaviors. Future research and interventions should take into consideration how parenting styles and practices mutually influence child weight and weight-related outcomes.

AB - Food parenting practices and parenting styles are associated with child weight status, dietary intake, and eating behaviors. Although parents maintain a parenting style while also engaging in food parenting practices day-to-day, most studies have examined the separate impact of these two constructs on child outcomes. An examination of both practices and styles will facilitate the identification of how they mutually co-exist and influence child weight and weight-related outcomes. The current study examined the clustering of food parenting practices and parenting styles and evaluated the relationship between these parenting characteristics and child weight status, diet quality and eating behaviors. Children aged 5–7 and their parents (N = 150) from six racial/ethnic groups were recruited through primary care clinics. Latent class analysis classified subgroups based on parenting practices and styles. Regression analyses examined relationships between subgroups and child outcomes. The best-fitting model was two subgroups. Parents in subgroup 1 (n = 37) were more likely to restrict foods, pressure children to eat and less likely to engage in food modeling compared to subgroup 2 (n = 112). Parents in subgroup 1 were more likely to report authoritarian and permissive parenting styles and less likely to report an authoritative parenting style, compared to subgroup 2. Parents in subgroup 1 were more likely to report children who ate to obtain pleasure and who lacked internal cues for hunger than those in subgroup 2. There were no association between subgroups and child weight status, diet quality and other eating behaviors. Future research and interventions should take into consideration how parenting styles and practices mutually influence child weight and weight-related outcomes.

KW - Behaviors

KW - Child weight

KW - Eating

KW - Latent class analysis

KW - Parenting practices

KW - Parenting styles

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064174368&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064174368&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.appet.2019.04.001

DO - 10.1016/j.appet.2019.04.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 30965046

AN - SCOPUS:85064174368

VL - 139

SP - 8

EP - 18

JO - Appetite

JF - Appetite

SN - 0195-6663

ER -