TY - JOUR
T1 - Anthracycline‐based therapy of de novo acute myeloid leukemia in adults
T2 - Failure of first‐cyde cytoreduction to predict second‐cycle outcome
AU - Hammerschmidt, Dale E
AU - Crea, Mary T Wild
PY - 1994/11
Y1 - 1994/11
N2 - During 1971–1988, 194 adults with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) received initial therapy at the University of Minnesota with an anthracycline‐based regimen. Seventy‐two of the 194 required further chemotherapy and received a second cycle of the same or similar therapy; 63 of these 72 were evaluable. For each marrow, a tumor burden index (TBI) was calculated, as the product of the marrow cellularity and the proportion of malignant cells. For each patient, the decrement in TBI between the initial and day ≈14 marrows was recorded. Patients who achieved second‐cycle CR were comparable to those who did not in general descriptors; there was no difference between second‐cycle CR achievers and nonachievers in the cytoreduction efleeted by the Initial cycle of therapy (74.9% ± 4.5% [σ] versus 71.9% = 5.9%). We then stratified patients according to the first‐cycle cytoreduction, asking if we could find a level that was reliably predictive of increased or decreased likelihood of achieving CR with cycle 2. We could not, despite testing at many centite cuts. Patients achieving a very “poor” degree of cytoreduction In cycle 1 were as likely to achieve CR with cycle 2 as were patients having a very “good” initial cytoreduction. We conclude that (1) first‐cycle response is not a useful predictor of second‐cycle outcome in anthracycline‐based therapy of de novo adult AML; and (2) a “poor” response to cycle 1 does not therefore a priori indicate a change to a different regimen for cycle 2. © 1994 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
AB - During 1971–1988, 194 adults with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) received initial therapy at the University of Minnesota with an anthracycline‐based regimen. Seventy‐two of the 194 required further chemotherapy and received a second cycle of the same or similar therapy; 63 of these 72 were evaluable. For each marrow, a tumor burden index (TBI) was calculated, as the product of the marrow cellularity and the proportion of malignant cells. For each patient, the decrement in TBI between the initial and day ≈14 marrows was recorded. Patients who achieved second‐cycle CR were comparable to those who did not in general descriptors; there was no difference between second‐cycle CR achievers and nonachievers in the cytoreduction efleeted by the Initial cycle of therapy (74.9% ± 4.5% [σ] versus 71.9% = 5.9%). We then stratified patients according to the first‐cycle cytoreduction, asking if we could find a level that was reliably predictive of increased or decreased likelihood of achieving CR with cycle 2. We could not, despite testing at many centite cuts. Patients achieving a very “poor” degree of cytoreduction In cycle 1 were as likely to achieve CR with cycle 2 as were patients having a very “good” initial cytoreduction. We conclude that (1) first‐cycle response is not a useful predictor of second‐cycle outcome in anthracycline‐based therapy of de novo adult AML; and (2) a “poor” response to cycle 1 does not therefore a priori indicate a change to a different regimen for cycle 2. © 1994 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
KW - acute myeloid leukemia
KW - anthracycline
KW - cytoreduction
KW - outcomes
KW - prognosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028051684&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028051684&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ajh.2830470305
DO - 10.1002/ajh.2830470305
M3 - Article
C2 - 7942780
AN - SCOPUS:0028051684
SN - 0361-8609
VL - 47
SP - 172
EP - 177
JO - American Journal of Hematology
JF - American Journal of Hematology
IS - 3
ER -