Anatomic Analysis of Palatal Roots of Maxillary Molars Using Micro–computed Tomography

Katherine A. Divine, Scott B McClanahan, Alex Fok

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: The morphology of the palatal root of maxillary first and second molars was analyzed and compared using micro–computed tomographic scanning. Methods: Forty-seven extracted maxillary molars were scanned with a micro–computed tomographic device to analyze the palatal radicular dentin dimensions, canal working width, root length, canal curvature, lateral canals, and apical constriction anatomy. Quantitative data were analyzed with mean and standard deviation for first and second molars, respectively. Comparison was made between first and second molars using an unpaired t test. Results: The palatal root of maxillary first molars was found to have statistically significantly thinner dentin than second molars on the palatal aspect of the root 8–11 mm from the apex, correlating to the coronal and middle thirds of the root. First molar palatal roots also had a statistically significantly wider canal mesiodistally than second molars at 13–15 mm from the apex, correlating approximately to the level of the cementoenamel junction and pulpal floor. Significant canal curvature was present. These findings suggest the need for conservative coronal flaring and instrumentation. Conclusions: The absence of an apical constriction in 76.6% of the specimens highlights the importance of creating an apical seat through instrumentation to maintain obturation materials. A minimum master apical file size of 40 is recommended based on preoperative working widths in the apical 0.5–1.0 mm. A root-end resection of 3.5 mm would remove a greater majority of lateral canals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)724-728
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Endodontics
Volume45
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2019

Fingerprint

X-Ray Microtomography
Dentin
Constriction
Tooth Cervix
Dental Pulp Cavity
Anatomy
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Apical constriction anatomy
  • canal anatomy
  • maxillary molar
  • palatal root
  • working width

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Cite this

Anatomic Analysis of Palatal Roots of Maxillary Molars Using Micro–computed Tomography. / Divine, Katherine A.; McClanahan, Scott B; Fok, Alex.

In: Journal of Endodontics, Vol. 45, No. 6, 01.06.2019, p. 724-728.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8c1b1a0a32d94542a53998cdaca6eede,
title = "Anatomic Analysis of Palatal Roots of Maxillary Molars Using Micro–computed Tomography",
abstract = "Introduction: The morphology of the palatal root of maxillary first and second molars was analyzed and compared using micro–computed tomographic scanning. Methods: Forty-seven extracted maxillary molars were scanned with a micro–computed tomographic device to analyze the palatal radicular dentin dimensions, canal working width, root length, canal curvature, lateral canals, and apical constriction anatomy. Quantitative data were analyzed with mean and standard deviation for first and second molars, respectively. Comparison was made between first and second molars using an unpaired t test. Results: The palatal root of maxillary first molars was found to have statistically significantly thinner dentin than second molars on the palatal aspect of the root 8–11 mm from the apex, correlating to the coronal and middle thirds of the root. First molar palatal roots also had a statistically significantly wider canal mesiodistally than second molars at 13–15 mm from the apex, correlating approximately to the level of the cementoenamel junction and pulpal floor. Significant canal curvature was present. These findings suggest the need for conservative coronal flaring and instrumentation. Conclusions: The absence of an apical constriction in 76.6{\%} of the specimens highlights the importance of creating an apical seat through instrumentation to maintain obturation materials. A minimum master apical file size of 40 is recommended based on preoperative working widths in the apical 0.5–1.0 mm. A root-end resection of 3.5 mm would remove a greater majority of lateral canals.",
keywords = "Apical constriction anatomy, canal anatomy, maxillary molar, palatal root, working width",
author = "Divine, {Katherine A.} and McClanahan, {Scott B} and Alex Fok",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.joen.2019.03.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "724--728",
journal = "Journal of Endodontics",
issn = "0099-2399",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anatomic Analysis of Palatal Roots of Maxillary Molars Using Micro–computed Tomography

AU - Divine, Katherine A.

AU - McClanahan, Scott B

AU - Fok, Alex

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - Introduction: The morphology of the palatal root of maxillary first and second molars was analyzed and compared using micro–computed tomographic scanning. Methods: Forty-seven extracted maxillary molars were scanned with a micro–computed tomographic device to analyze the palatal radicular dentin dimensions, canal working width, root length, canal curvature, lateral canals, and apical constriction anatomy. Quantitative data were analyzed with mean and standard deviation for first and second molars, respectively. Comparison was made between first and second molars using an unpaired t test. Results: The palatal root of maxillary first molars was found to have statistically significantly thinner dentin than second molars on the palatal aspect of the root 8–11 mm from the apex, correlating to the coronal and middle thirds of the root. First molar palatal roots also had a statistically significantly wider canal mesiodistally than second molars at 13–15 mm from the apex, correlating approximately to the level of the cementoenamel junction and pulpal floor. Significant canal curvature was present. These findings suggest the need for conservative coronal flaring and instrumentation. Conclusions: The absence of an apical constriction in 76.6% of the specimens highlights the importance of creating an apical seat through instrumentation to maintain obturation materials. A minimum master apical file size of 40 is recommended based on preoperative working widths in the apical 0.5–1.0 mm. A root-end resection of 3.5 mm would remove a greater majority of lateral canals.

AB - Introduction: The morphology of the palatal root of maxillary first and second molars was analyzed and compared using micro–computed tomographic scanning. Methods: Forty-seven extracted maxillary molars were scanned with a micro–computed tomographic device to analyze the palatal radicular dentin dimensions, canal working width, root length, canal curvature, lateral canals, and apical constriction anatomy. Quantitative data were analyzed with mean and standard deviation for first and second molars, respectively. Comparison was made between first and second molars using an unpaired t test. Results: The palatal root of maxillary first molars was found to have statistically significantly thinner dentin than second molars on the palatal aspect of the root 8–11 mm from the apex, correlating to the coronal and middle thirds of the root. First molar palatal roots also had a statistically significantly wider canal mesiodistally than second molars at 13–15 mm from the apex, correlating approximately to the level of the cementoenamel junction and pulpal floor. Significant canal curvature was present. These findings suggest the need for conservative coronal flaring and instrumentation. Conclusions: The absence of an apical constriction in 76.6% of the specimens highlights the importance of creating an apical seat through instrumentation to maintain obturation materials. A minimum master apical file size of 40 is recommended based on preoperative working widths in the apical 0.5–1.0 mm. A root-end resection of 3.5 mm would remove a greater majority of lateral canals.

KW - Apical constriction anatomy

KW - canal anatomy

KW - maxillary molar

KW - palatal root

KW - working width

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064888869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064888869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.joen.2019.03.007

DO - 10.1016/j.joen.2019.03.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 31056296

AN - SCOPUS:85064888869

VL - 45

SP - 724

EP - 728

JO - Journal of Endodontics

JF - Journal of Endodontics

SN - 0099-2399

IS - 6

ER -