An ordered tobit model of market participation: Evidence from Kenya and Ethiopia

Marc F. Bellemare; Christopher B. Barrett

doi:10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00861.x

An ordered tobit model of market participation: Evidence from Kenya and Ethiopia

Marc F. Bellemare, Christopher B. Barrett

Applied Economics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

151 Scopus citations

Abstract

Do rural households in developing countries make market participation and volume decisions simultaneously or sequentially? This article develops a two-stage econometric method to test between these two competing hypotheses regarding household-level marketing behavior. The first stage models the household's choice of whether to be a net buyer, autarkic, or a net seller in the market. The second stage models the quantity bought (sold) for net buyers (sellers) based on observable household characteristics. Using household data from Kenyan and Ethiopian livestock markets, we find evidence in favor of sequential decision making, the welfare implications of which we discuss.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	324-337
Number of pages	14
Journal	American Journal of Agricultural Economics
Volume	88
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00861.x
State	Published - May 2006

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We thank Peter Berck, Marc-André Bodet, J.S. Butler, John Cockburn, Garth Holloway, David Just, Daniel Lawson, John McPeak, Christian Vossler, three anonymous referees, and the 2004 NEUDC Conference participants for useful comments as well as Erin Lentz, Sharon Osterloh, and Amare Yirbecho for data assistance. Data collection was supported by the Pastoral Risk Management (PARIMA) Project of the Global Livestock Collaborative Research Support Program (GL CRSP), funded by the Office of Agriculture and Food Security, Global Bureau, USAID, under grants DAN-1328-G-00-0046-00 and PCE-G-98-00036-00. Data analysis was supported by the GL CRSP’s Livestock Trade in Ethiopia and Kenya (LITEK) project and by the Strategies and Analyses for Growth and Access (SAGA) cooperative agreement, Africa Bureau, USAID, under grant HFM-A-00-01-00132-00. The views expressed are solely the authors’ and do not represent any official agency. All remaining errors are ours alone.

Keywords

Agricultural household models
Discrete choice and limited dependent variables
Livestock markets
Market participation
Transactions costs

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Publisher link

10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00861.x

Find It

Find It at U of M Libraries

Cite this

@article{2488b8ce77b54f718c25e33bc6649673,

title = "An ordered tobit model of market participation: Evidence from Kenya and Ethiopia",

abstract = "Do rural households in developing countries make market participation and volume decisions simultaneously or sequentially? This article develops a two-stage econometric method to test between these two competing hypotheses regarding household-level marketing behavior. The first stage models the household's choice of whether to be a net buyer, autarkic, or a net seller in the market. The second stage models the quantity bought (sold) for net buyers (sellers) based on observable household characteristics. Using household data from Kenyan and Ethiopian livestock markets, we find evidence in favor of sequential decision making, the welfare implications of which we discuss.",

keywords = "Agricultural household models, Discrete choice and limited dependent variables, Livestock markets, Market participation, Transactions costs",

author = "Bellemare, {Marc F.} and Barrett, {Christopher B.}",

note = "Funding Information: We thank Peter Berck, Marc-Andr{\'e} Bodet, J.S. Butler, John Cockburn, Garth Holloway, David Just, Daniel Lawson, John McPeak, Christian Vossler, three anonymous referees, and the 2004 NEUDC Conference participants for useful comments as well as Erin Lentz, Sharon Osterloh, and Amare Yirbecho for data assistance. Data collection was supported by the Pastoral Risk Management (PARIMA) Project of the Global Livestock Collaborative Research Support Program (GL CRSP), funded by the Office of Agriculture and Food Security, Global Bureau, USAID, under grants DAN-1328-G-00-0046-00 and PCE-G-98-00036-00. Data analysis was supported by the GL CRSP{\textquoteright}s Livestock Trade in Ethiopia and Kenya (LITEK) project and by the Strategies and Analyses for Growth and Access (SAGA) cooperative agreement, Africa Bureau, USAID, under grant HFM-A-00-01-00132-00. The views expressed are solely the authors{\textquoteright} and do not represent any official agency. All remaining errors are ours alone.",

year = "2006",

month = may,

doi = "10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00861.x",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "88",

pages = "324--337",

journal = "American Journal of Agricultural Economics",

issn = "0002-9092",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An ordered tobit model of market participation

T2 - Evidence from Kenya and Ethiopia

AU - Bellemare, Marc F.

AU - Barrett, Christopher B.

N1 - Funding Information: We thank Peter Berck, Marc-André Bodet, J.S. Butler, John Cockburn, Garth Holloway, David Just, Daniel Lawson, John McPeak, Christian Vossler, three anonymous referees, and the 2004 NEUDC Conference participants for useful comments as well as Erin Lentz, Sharon Osterloh, and Amare Yirbecho for data assistance. Data collection was supported by the Pastoral Risk Management (PARIMA) Project of the Global Livestock Collaborative Research Support Program (GL CRSP), funded by the Office of Agriculture and Food Security, Global Bureau, USAID, under grants DAN-1328-G-00-0046-00 and PCE-G-98-00036-00. Data analysis was supported by the GL CRSP’s Livestock Trade in Ethiopia and Kenya (LITEK) project and by the Strategies and Analyses for Growth and Access (SAGA) cooperative agreement, Africa Bureau, USAID, under grant HFM-A-00-01-00132-00. The views expressed are solely the authors’ and do not represent any official agency. All remaining errors are ours alone.

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - Do rural households in developing countries make market participation and volume decisions simultaneously or sequentially? This article develops a two-stage econometric method to test between these two competing hypotheses regarding household-level marketing behavior. The first stage models the household's choice of whether to be a net buyer, autarkic, or a net seller in the market. The second stage models the quantity bought (sold) for net buyers (sellers) based on observable household characteristics. Using household data from Kenyan and Ethiopian livestock markets, we find evidence in favor of sequential decision making, the welfare implications of which we discuss.

AB - Do rural households in developing countries make market participation and volume decisions simultaneously or sequentially? This article develops a two-stage econometric method to test between these two competing hypotheses regarding household-level marketing behavior. The first stage models the household's choice of whether to be a net buyer, autarkic, or a net seller in the market. The second stage models the quantity bought (sold) for net buyers (sellers) based on observable household characteristics. Using household data from Kenyan and Ethiopian livestock markets, we find evidence in favor of sequential decision making, the welfare implications of which we discuss.

KW - Agricultural household models

KW - Discrete choice and limited dependent variables

KW - Livestock markets

KW - Market participation

KW - Transactions costs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645727629&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645727629&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00861.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00861.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33645727629

SN - 0002-9092

VL - 88

SP - 324

EP - 337

JO - American Journal of Agricultural Economics

JF - American Journal of Agricultural Economics

IS - 2

ER -

An ordered tobit model of market participation: Evidence from Kenya and Ethiopia

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

UN SDGs

Publisher link

Find It

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this