An analytical model for estimation of land surface net water flux from near-surface soil moisture observations

Seyyed Morteza Sadeghi, Markus Tuller, Arthur W. Warrick, Ebrahim Babaeian, Kshitij Parajuli, Mohammad R. Gohardoust, Scott B. Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The accurate determination of land surface water fluxes at various spatiotemporal scales remains a challenge in hydrological sciences. It is intuitive that land surface net water flux (i.e., infiltration minus evapotranspiration) directly affects near-surface soil moisture. However, there exists no hydrological model suitable to calculate net water flux based on measured near-surface soil moisture data. This is a consequence of the mathematical structure of existing models that use ‘boundary conditions’ to determine ‘internal conditions’ whereas what is needed is a model amenable to use near-surface soil moisture data (an internal condition) to determine the surface water flux (a boundary condition). To pursue the idea of utilizing remotely-sensed or in situ (i.e., sensor networks) near surface soil moisture data for estimation of net water flux, we derived an analytical model via inversion of Warrick's 1975 analytical solution to the linearized Richards’ equation for arbitrary time-varying surface flux boundary conditions. The applicability of the new analytical solution was evaluated based on actual water flux observations as well as HYDRUS-1D simulations for four vastly different sites in Arizona, California, Idaho, and Indiana. Our results demonstrate that the proposed model reasonably captures net water flux variations in natural settings, including layered and vegetated soils, especially at larger time scales (e.g., monthly). While the model works for a wide range of climatic conditions, the prediction accuracy is somewhat lower for extreme dry or wet conditions. A major advantage of the new model is that it does not require calibration, which provides an unprecedented opportunity for large scale estimation of land surface net water flux using remotely sensed near-surface soil moisture observations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)26-37
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Hydrology
Volume570
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2019

Fingerprint

land surface
soil moisture
boundary condition
water
evapotranspiration
infiltration
surface water
Richards equation
surface flux
sensor
calibration
timescale
prediction
simulation
soil

Keywords

  • Analytical model
  • Evapotranspiration
  • Infiltration
  • Near-surface soil moisture
  • Remote sensing
  • Richards’ equation

Cite this

An analytical model for estimation of land surface net water flux from near-surface soil moisture observations. / Sadeghi, Seyyed Morteza; Tuller, Markus; Warrick, Arthur W.; Babaeian, Ebrahim; Parajuli, Kshitij; Gohardoust, Mohammad R.; Jones, Scott B.

In: Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 570, 01.03.2019, p. 26-37.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sadeghi, Seyyed Morteza ; Tuller, Markus ; Warrick, Arthur W. ; Babaeian, Ebrahim ; Parajuli, Kshitij ; Gohardoust, Mohammad R. ; Jones, Scott B. / An analytical model for estimation of land surface net water flux from near-surface soil moisture observations. In: Journal of Hydrology. 2019 ; Vol. 570. pp. 26-37.
@article{42af78536c464b80b79a89b3f31e1dc2,
title = "An analytical model for estimation of land surface net water flux from near-surface soil moisture observations",
abstract = "The accurate determination of land surface water fluxes at various spatiotemporal scales remains a challenge in hydrological sciences. It is intuitive that land surface net water flux (i.e., infiltration minus evapotranspiration) directly affects near-surface soil moisture. However, there exists no hydrological model suitable to calculate net water flux based on measured near-surface soil moisture data. This is a consequence of the mathematical structure of existing models that use ‘boundary conditions’ to determine ‘internal conditions’ whereas what is needed is a model amenable to use near-surface soil moisture data (an internal condition) to determine the surface water flux (a boundary condition). To pursue the idea of utilizing remotely-sensed or in situ (i.e., sensor networks) near surface soil moisture data for estimation of net water flux, we derived an analytical model via inversion of Warrick's 1975 analytical solution to the linearized Richards’ equation for arbitrary time-varying surface flux boundary conditions. The applicability of the new analytical solution was evaluated based on actual water flux observations as well as HYDRUS-1D simulations for four vastly different sites in Arizona, California, Idaho, and Indiana. Our results demonstrate that the proposed model reasonably captures net water flux variations in natural settings, including layered and vegetated soils, especially at larger time scales (e.g., monthly). While the model works for a wide range of climatic conditions, the prediction accuracy is somewhat lower for extreme dry or wet conditions. A major advantage of the new model is that it does not require calibration, which provides an unprecedented opportunity for large scale estimation of land surface net water flux using remotely sensed near-surface soil moisture observations.",
keywords = "Analytical model, Evapotranspiration, Infiltration, Near-surface soil moisture, Remote sensing, Richards’ equation",
author = "Sadeghi, {Seyyed Morteza} and Markus Tuller and Warrick, {Arthur W.} and Ebrahim Babaeian and Kshitij Parajuli and Gohardoust, {Mohammad R.} and Jones, {Scott B.}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.038",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "570",
pages = "26--37",
journal = "Journal of Hydrology",
issn = "0022-1694",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An analytical model for estimation of land surface net water flux from near-surface soil moisture observations

AU - Sadeghi, Seyyed Morteza

AU - Tuller, Markus

AU - Warrick, Arthur W.

AU - Babaeian, Ebrahim

AU - Parajuli, Kshitij

AU - Gohardoust, Mohammad R.

AU - Jones, Scott B.

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - The accurate determination of land surface water fluxes at various spatiotemporal scales remains a challenge in hydrological sciences. It is intuitive that land surface net water flux (i.e., infiltration minus evapotranspiration) directly affects near-surface soil moisture. However, there exists no hydrological model suitable to calculate net water flux based on measured near-surface soil moisture data. This is a consequence of the mathematical structure of existing models that use ‘boundary conditions’ to determine ‘internal conditions’ whereas what is needed is a model amenable to use near-surface soil moisture data (an internal condition) to determine the surface water flux (a boundary condition). To pursue the idea of utilizing remotely-sensed or in situ (i.e., sensor networks) near surface soil moisture data for estimation of net water flux, we derived an analytical model via inversion of Warrick's 1975 analytical solution to the linearized Richards’ equation for arbitrary time-varying surface flux boundary conditions. The applicability of the new analytical solution was evaluated based on actual water flux observations as well as HYDRUS-1D simulations for four vastly different sites in Arizona, California, Idaho, and Indiana. Our results demonstrate that the proposed model reasonably captures net water flux variations in natural settings, including layered and vegetated soils, especially at larger time scales (e.g., monthly). While the model works for a wide range of climatic conditions, the prediction accuracy is somewhat lower for extreme dry or wet conditions. A major advantage of the new model is that it does not require calibration, which provides an unprecedented opportunity for large scale estimation of land surface net water flux using remotely sensed near-surface soil moisture observations.

AB - The accurate determination of land surface water fluxes at various spatiotemporal scales remains a challenge in hydrological sciences. It is intuitive that land surface net water flux (i.e., infiltration minus evapotranspiration) directly affects near-surface soil moisture. However, there exists no hydrological model suitable to calculate net water flux based on measured near-surface soil moisture data. This is a consequence of the mathematical structure of existing models that use ‘boundary conditions’ to determine ‘internal conditions’ whereas what is needed is a model amenable to use near-surface soil moisture data (an internal condition) to determine the surface water flux (a boundary condition). To pursue the idea of utilizing remotely-sensed or in situ (i.e., sensor networks) near surface soil moisture data for estimation of net water flux, we derived an analytical model via inversion of Warrick's 1975 analytical solution to the linearized Richards’ equation for arbitrary time-varying surface flux boundary conditions. The applicability of the new analytical solution was evaluated based on actual water flux observations as well as HYDRUS-1D simulations for four vastly different sites in Arizona, California, Idaho, and Indiana. Our results demonstrate that the proposed model reasonably captures net water flux variations in natural settings, including layered and vegetated soils, especially at larger time scales (e.g., monthly). While the model works for a wide range of climatic conditions, the prediction accuracy is somewhat lower for extreme dry or wet conditions. A major advantage of the new model is that it does not require calibration, which provides an unprecedented opportunity for large scale estimation of land surface net water flux using remotely sensed near-surface soil moisture observations.

KW - Analytical model

KW - Evapotranspiration

KW - Infiltration

KW - Near-surface soil moisture

KW - Remote sensing

KW - Richards’ equation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060136353&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060136353&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.038

DO - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.038

M3 - Article

VL - 570

SP - 26

EP - 37

JO - Journal of Hydrology

JF - Journal of Hydrology

SN - 0022-1694

ER -