Americans’ Knowledge of Their Local Judges

Mark Jonathan McKenzie, Cynthia R. Rugeley, Daniel Benjamin Bailey, Seth C. McKee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations


What do Americans know about their local judges and how do they know it? One of the central arguments in the debate over judicial elections is whether voters know enough about judicial candidates to make an informed democratic choice. The vast majority of criminal and civil matters in the U.S. begin with and filter through the local state courts. But judicial scholars know little about what explains the variance in voters’ knowledge of their courts and judges. This paper draws on survey data from the 2012 Cooperative Congressional Election Study to investigate the origins of voter knowledge of local judges. A central finding of this study is that rural voters are a lot more knowledgeable about their local judges than are urban voters, ceteris paribus. This finding has significant consequences for the debate over the ways in which states structure their elections for local judges.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)259-277
Number of pages19
JournalPolitical Behavior
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York.


  • Judicial politics
  • Local judges
  • Political knowledge
  • Rural voters


Dive into the research topics of 'Americans’ Knowledge of Their Local Judges'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this