American Indian/Alaska native uninsurance disparities: A comparison of 3 surveys

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations


Objectives. We examined whether 3 nationally representative data sources produce consistent estimates of disparities and rates of uninsurance among the American Indian/Alaska Native (AIAN) population and to demonstrate howchoice of data source impacts study conclusions. Methods. We estimated all-year and point-in-time uninsurance rates for AIANs and non-Hispanic Whites younger than 65 years using 3 surveys: Current Population Survey (CPS), National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), and Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). Results. Sociodemographic differences across surveys suggest that national samples produce differing estimates of the AIAN population. AIAN all-year uninsurance rates varied across surveys (3%-23% for children and 18%-35% for adults). Measures of dispa rity also differed by survey. For all-year uninsurance, the unadjusted rate for AIAN children was 2,9 times higher than the rate for White children with the CPS, but there were no significant disparities with the NHIS or MEPS. Compared with White adults, AIAN adults had unadjusted rate ratios of 2.5 with the CPS and 2.2 with the NHIS or MEPS. Conclusions. Different data sources produce substantially different estimates for the same population. Consequently, conclusions about health care disparities may be influenced by the data source used.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1972-1979
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican journal of public health
Issue number10
StatePublished - Oct 1 2010
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'American Indian/Alaska native uninsurance disparities: A comparison of 3 surveys'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this